Links needs your support! Donate what you can!



Click on Links masthead to clear previous query from search box

Socialist Alliance Australia



Syndicate

Syndicate content

Global food crisis: ‘The greatest demonstration of the historical failure of the capitalist model’

By Ian Angus

[First of two articles. Click here for part two.] 

“If the government cannot lower the cost of living it simply has to leave. If the police and UN troops want to shoot at us, that's OK, because in the end, if we are not killed by bullets, we’ll die of hunger.” — A demonstrator in Port-au-Prince, Haiti

April 28, 2008 -- In Haiti, where most people get 22% fewer calories than the minimum needed for good health, some are staving off their hunger pangs by eating “mud biscuits” made by mixing clay and water with a bit of vegetable oil and salt.[1]

Meanwhile, in Canada, the federal government is currently paying $225 for each pig killed in a mass cull of breeding swine, as part of a plan to reduce hog production. Hog farmers, squeezed by low hog prices and high feed costs, have responded so enthusiastically that the kill will likely use up all the allocated funds before the program ends in September. Some of the slaughtered hogs may be given to local Food Banks, but most will be destroyed or made into pet food. None will go to Haiti.

This is the brutal world of capitalist agriculture — a world where some people destroy food because prices are too low, and others literally eat dirt because food prices are too high.

Record prices for staple foods

We are in the midst of an unprecedented worldwide food price inflation that has driven prices to their highest levels in decades. The increases affect most kinds of food, but in particular the most important staples — wheat, corn, and rice.

The UN Food and Agriculture Organization says that between March 2007 and March 2008 prices of cereals increased 88%, oils and fats 106%, and dairy 48%. The FAO food price index as a whole rose 57% in one year — and most of the increase occurred in the past few months.

Another source, the World Bank, says that that in the 36 months ending February 2008, global wheat prices rose 181% and overall global food prices increased by 83%. The bank expects most food prices to remain well above 2004 levels until at least 2015.

The most popular grade of Thailand rice sold for $198 a tonne five years ago and $323 a tonne a year ago. On April 24, the price hit $1000.

Increases are even greater on local markets — in Haiti, the market price of a 50 kilo bag of rice doubled in one week at the end of March.

These increases are catastrophic for the 2.6 billion people around the world who live on less than US$2 a day and spend 60% to 80% of their incomes on food. Hundreds of millions cannot afford to eat.

This month, the hungry fought back.

Taking to the streets

In Haiti, on April 3, demonstrators in the southern city of Les Cayes built barricades, stopped trucks carrying rice and distributed the food, and tried to burn a United Nations compound. The protests quickly spread to the capital, Port-au-Prince, where thousands marched on the presidential palace, chanting “We are hungry!” Many called for the withdrawal of UN troops and the return of Jean-Bertrand Aristide, the exiled president whose government was overthrown by foreign powers in 2004.

President René Préval, who initially said nothing could be done, has announced a 16% cut in the wholesale price of rice. This is at best a stop-gap measure, since the reduction is for one month only, and retailers are not obligated to cut their prices.

The actions in Haiti paralleled similar protests by hungry people in more than 20 other countries.

  • In Burkino Faso, a two-day general strike by unions and shopkeepers demanded “significant and effective” reductions in the price of rice and other staple foods.

  • In Bangladesh, more than 20,000 workers from textile factories in Fatullah went on strike to demand lower prices and higher wages. They hurled bricks and stones at police, who fired tear gas into the crowd.

  • The Egyptian government sent thousands of troops into the Mahalla textile complex in the Nile Delta, to prevent a general strike demanding higher wages, an independent union, and lower prices. Two people were killed and more than 600 have been jailed.

  • In Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire, police used tear gas against women who had set up barricades, burned tires and closed major roads. Thousands marched to the President’s home, chanting “We are hungry,” and “Life is too expensive, you are killing us.”

  • In Pakistan and Thailand, armed soldiers have been deployed to prevent the poor from seizing food from fields and warehouses.

Similar protests have taken place in Cameroon, Ethiopia, Honduras, Indonesia, Madagascar, Mauritania, Niger, Peru, Philippines, Senegal, Thailand, Uzbekistan and Zambia. On April 2, the president of the World Bank told a meeting in Washington that there are 33 countries where price hikes could cause social unrest.

A senior editor of Time magazine warned:

“The idea of the starving masses driven by their desperation to take to the streets and overthrow the ancien regime has seemed impossibly quaint since capitalism triumphed so decisively in the Cold War…. And yet, the headlines of the past month suggest that skyrocketing food prices are threatening the stability of a growing number of governments around the world. …. when circumstances render it impossible to feed their hungry children, normally passive citizens can very quickly become militants with nothing to lose.”[2]

What’s driving food inflation?

Since the 1970s, food production has become increasingly globalised and concentrated. A handful of countries dominate the global trade in staple foods. Eighy per cent of wheat exports come from six exporters, as does 85% of rice. Three countries produce 70% of exported corn. This leaves the world’s poorest countries, the ones that must import food to survive, at the mercy of economic trends and policies in those few exporting companies. When the global food trade system stops delivering, it’s the poor who pay the price.

For several years, the global trade in staple foods has been heading towards a crisis. Four related trends have slowed production growth and pushed prices up.

The end of the `green revolution': In the 1960s and 1970s, in an effort to counter peasant discontent in south and southeast Asia, the U.S. poured money and technical support into agricultural development in India and other countries. The “green revolution” — new seeds, fertilisers, pesticides, agricultural techniques and infrastructure — led to spectacular increases in food production, particularly rice. Yield per hectare continued expanding until the 1990s.

Today, it’s not fashionable for governments to help poor people grow food for other poor people, because “the market” is supposed to take care of all problems. The Economist reports that “spending on farming as a share of total public spending in developing countries fell by half between 1980 and 2004.”[3] Subsidies and R&D money have dried up, and production growth has stalled.

As a result, in seven of the past eight years the world consumed more grain than it produced, which means that rice was being removed from the inventories that governments and dealers normally hold as insurance against bad harvests. World grain stocks are now at their lowest point ever, leaving very little cushion for bad times.

Climate change: Scientists say that climate change could cut food production in parts of the world by 50% in the next 12 years. But that isn’t just a matter for the future:

  • Australia is normally the world’s second-largest exporter of grain, but a savage multi-year drought has reduced the wheat crop by 60% and rice production has been completely wiped out.

  • In Bangladesh in November, one of the strongest cyclones in decades wiped out a million tonnes of rice and severely damaged the wheat crop, making the huge country even more dependent on imported food.

Other examples abound. It’s clear that the global climate crisis is already here, and it is affecting food.

Agrofuels: It is now official policy in the US, Canada and Europe to convert food into fuel. US vehicles burn enough corn to cover the entire import needs of the poorest 82 countries.[4]

Ethanol and biodiesel are very heavily subsidised, which means, inevitably, that crops like corn (maize) are being diverted out of the food chain and into gas tanks, and that new agricultural investment worldwide is being directed towards palm, soy, canola and other oil-producing plants. The demand for agrofuels increases the prices of those crops directly, and indirectly boosts the price of other grains by encouraging growers to switch to agrofuel.

As Canadian hog producers have found, it also drives up the cost of producing meat, since corn is the main ingredient in North American animal feed.

Oil prices: The price of food is linked to the price of oil because food can be made into a substitute for oil. But rising oil prices also affect the cost of producing food. Fertiliser and pesticides are made from petroleum and natural gas. Gas and diesel fuel are used in planting, harvesting and shipping.[5]

It’s been estimated that 80% of the costs of growing corn are fossil fuel costs — so it is no accident that food prices rise when oil prices rise.

* * *

By the end of 2007, reduced investment in third world agriculture, rising oil prices, and climate change meant that production growth was slowing and prices were rising. Good harvests and strong export growth might have staved off a crisis — but that isn’t what happened. The trigger was rice, the staple food of three billion people.

Early this year, India announced that it was suspending most rice exports in order to rebuild its reserves. A few weeks later, Vietnam, whose rice crop was hit by a major insect infestation during the harvest, announced a four-month suspension of exports to ensure that enough would be available for its domestic market.

India and Vietnam together normally account for 30% of all rice exports, so their announcements were enough to push the already tight global rice market over the edge. Rice buyers immediately started buying up available stocks, hoarding whatever rice they could get in the expectation of future price increases, and bidding up the price for future crops. Prices soared. By mid-April, news reports described “panic buying” of rice futures on the Chicago Board of Trade, and there were rice shortages even on supermarket shelves in Canada and the US.

Why the rebellion?

There have been food price spikes before. Indeed, if we take inflation into account, global prices for staple foods were higher in the 1970s than they are today. So why has this inflationary explosion provoked mass protests around the world?

The answer is that since the 1970s the richest countries in the world, aided by the international agencies they control, have systematically undermined the poorest countries’ ability to feed their populations and protect themselves in a crisis like this.

Haiti is a powerful and appalling example.

Rice has been grown in Haiti for centuries, and until 20 years ago Haitian farmers produced about 170,000 tonnes of rice a year, enough to cover 95% of domestic consumption. Rice farmers received no government subsidies, but, as in every other rice-producing country at the time, their access to local markets was protected by import tariffs.

In 1995, as a condition of providing a desperately needed loan, the International Monetary Fund required Haiti to cut its tariff on imported rice from 35% to 3%, the lowest in the Caribbean. The result was a massive influx of US rice that sold for half the price of Haitian-grown rice. Thousands of rice farmers lost their lands and livelihoods, and today three-quarters of the rice eaten in Haiti comes from the US.[6]

US rice didn’t take over the Haitian market because it tastes better, or because US rice growers are more efficient. It won out because rice exports are heavily subsidised by the US government. In 2003, US rice growers received $1.7 billion in government subsidies, an average of $232 per hectare of rice grown.[7] That money, most of which went to a handful of very large landowners and agribusiness corporations, allowed U.S. exporters to sell rice at 30% to 50% below their real production costs.

In short, Haiti was forced to abandon government protection of domestic agriculture — and the US then used its government protection schemes to take over the market.

There have been many variations on this theme, with rich countries of the north imposing “liberalisation” policies on poor and debt-ridden southern countries and then taking advantage of that liberalization to capture the market. Government subsidies account for 30% of farm revenue in the world’s 30 richest countries, a total of US$280 billion a year,[8] an unbeatable advantage in a “free” market where the rich write the rules.

The global food trade game is rigged, and the poor have been left with reduced crops and no protections.

In addition, for several decades the World Bank and International Monetary Fund have refused to advance loans to poor countries unless they agree to “Structural Adjustment Programs” (SAP) that require the loan recipients to devalue their currencies, cut taxes, privatize utilities, and reduce or eliminate support programs for farmers.

All this was done with the promise that the market would produce economic growth and prosperity — instead, poverty increased and support for agriculture was eliminated.

“The investment in improved agricultural input packages and extension support tapered and eventually disappeared in most rural areas of Africa under SAP. Concern for boosting smallholders’ productivity was abandoned. Not only were governments rolled back, foreign aid to agriculture dwindled. World Bank funding for agriculture itself declined markedly from 32% of total lending in 1976-8 to 11.7% in 1997-9.”[9]

During previous waves of food price inflation, the poor often had at least some access to food they grew themselves, or to food that was grown locally and available at locally set prices. Today, in many countries in Africa, Asia and Latin America, that’s just not possible. Global markets now determine local prices — and often the only food available must be imported from far away.

* * *

Food is not just another commodity — it is absolutely essential for human survival. The very least that humanity should expect from any government or social system is that it try to prevent starvation — and above all that it not promote policies that deny food to hungry people.

That’s why Venezuelan president Hugo Chavez was absolutely correct on April 24, to describe the food crisis as “the greatest demonstration of the historical failure of the capitalist model.”

 

[Ian Angus is the editor of Climate and Capitalism. This article first appeared in Socialist Voice (Canada). A companion article, ``Global food crisis: Capitalism, agribusiness and the food sovereignty alternative'', is at http://www.links.org.au/node/417]
* * *

Footnotes

[1] Kevin Pina. “Mud Cookie Economics in Haiti.” Haiti Action Network, Feb. 10, 2008. http://www.haitiaction.net/News/HIP/2_10_8/2_10_8.html

[2] Tony Karon. “How Hunger Could Topple Regimes.” Time, April 11, 2008. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,1730107,00.html

[3] “The New Face of Hunger.” The Economist, April 19, 2008.

[4] Mark Lynas. “How the Rich Starved the World.” New Statesman, April 17, 2008. http://www.newstatesman.com/200804170025

[5] Dale Allen Pfeiffer. Eating Fossil Fuels. New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island BC, 2006. p. 1

[6] Oxfam International Briefing Paper, April 2005. “Kicking Down the Door.” http://www.oxfam.org/en/files/bp72_rice.pdf

[7] Ibid.

[8] OECD Background Note: Agricultural Policy and Trade Reform. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/52/23/36896656.pdf

[9] Kjell Havnevik, Deborah Bryceson, Lars-Erik Birgegård, Prosper Matondi & Atakilte Beyene. “African Agriculture and the World Bank: Development or Impoverishment?” Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal, http://www.links.org.au/node/328

 

Comments

How the Market Has Driven up Prices and Hunger

The Global Food Crisis
How the Market Has Driven up Prices and Hunger

Karen Harper, Oakland LMV

Anger at rapidly rising food prices has now been surpassed in the US by
anger at the high cost of gas and getting to work. For the 2 billion
ordinary people around the globe that live on less than $2 a day, the
current global food crisis is having a huge impact. It is likely that
more people will starve to death in the coming months than die as a
result of all the current wars on the planet combined. How did this
situation arise?

There has been a worldwide increase in prices in certain food
commodities especially cereals, which are the staple foods for a huge
proportion of the world's population. Primarily affected are wheat,
corn, rice and soybeans. These price increases in turn are affecting the
prices of other foods like dairy products and eggs. Slightly less
affected at this point are the prices of meats and vegetables.

For example, globally, food prices have increased by 83% in the past 36
months, 1 with the greatest price increase happening since the summer of
2007. Rice prices in Asia have increased two to threefold in the recent
period and specifically doubled this year. Thai rice at the end of 2007
was $320 per metric ton, in May 2008 it was $1100 per metric ton.2 In
May of 2008, corn in the US was priced at $5.50 a bushel, which is
double the 2007 price, 3 and at the Minneapolis Grain Exchange in
February wheat prices had quadrupled in one year to over $15 a bushel.4
Even food commodities that have primarily local markets have increased
in price: lentils in India have increased from $300 to $800 per ton
during this same period.5 In Burundi a product called farine noir, a
combination of black flour and moldy cassava, which is sold as a
subsistence food to the very poor, saw its price triple in eight weeks.6

In China food inflation was estimated at about 18% for last year.7 In
the Middle-east, which is net food importer, the food import bill has
increased 170% since 2000. In Egypt and Yemen alone food prices have
increased almost 60% in one year.8 In Pakistan food and beverage prices
increased by over 20% in March of this year alone.9

*Worldwide Starvation, Increased Revolts *
The biggest impact from price increases are on the world's poorest
people. There are many references to the "world's bottom billion," which
is generally the population who live on less than $1 per day, and is
currently about 880 million people. This is an arbitrary dividing line,
and in fact, 2.1 billion people live on less than $2-a day.10 The UN
estimates that with the current rise in food prices 100-130 million more
people are at risk from hunger than they were 8 months ago.11 In the
world's under developed countries the poorest people spend about 40-70%
of their incomes on food, compared to 10-15% in the industrialized
nations.12 So it is clear how this food crisis is greater for those
living in poverty.

In response to these dramatic price increases, there has been increased
unrest in dozens of countries in the form of strikes and riots. Haiti,
Egypt, Yemen, and the Philippines have had some forms of rioting. In
Haiti the Prime Minister was forced to resign in response to the unrest
over food prices. In Lebanon, a general strike was organized in response
to price increases, and calls for strikes in Egypt have been
aggressively suppressed by the US-backed regime there.

Some countries, desperate to prevent food-related unrest, have
introduced increased price controls for food. India and Vietnam, the #2
and #3 rice exporters in the world, have begun export restrictions.13
Also countries such as Argentina, China, Cambodia, and Indonesia have
introduced similar measures.
India, under pressure from its population's rising anger, shut down its
food futures markets to try to dampen price fluctuations. Indonesia,
Thailand, and Cambodia are providing subsidized rice to their
populations, and the government of the Philippines has been buying up
massive amounts of rice, which it then plans to provide to its
population at a lower cost.
However when the Philippines government tried to buy up 500,000 tons of
rice on the global market, only 300,000 tons were available for
purchase.14

*Energy and Food Crisis Converge*
There are multiple reasons why food prices are increasing, primary among
these is the increase in fuel costs. Currently oil is selling at about
$135 a barrel, which has more than doubled since last year's high price.
This is a huge additional expense for food production, especially for
factory farming practices. These are very fuel-intense and highly
mechanized, with the use of tractors and other heavy machinery. Also,
with globalized food production, there is increased shipping of food
around the globe, which is consuming more fuel. This is entirely a
market-driven process. Food production is geared toward producing large
volumes of food cheaply, which is then shipped to where they are most
likely to be sold for the most profit.

This process increases the dependence on cash crops for many farmers in
the developing world who hope to produce enough to make a meager living
for themselves. However, this makes many poor rural dwellers more
vulnerable to the market. Inherent in capitalism's inequality, they will
never be paid the full value of the food products they are producing, so
they can never afford to buy back what they are producing. In areas
where farm productivity is relatively low it is impossible for them to
make enough income from what they produce to buy back enough basic food
for themselves and their families. This just puts them at a further
disadvantage compared to their counterparts in more developed countries
whose farming techniques are more productive per acre: simply irrigating
land doubles its productivity compared to non-irrigated land. In the US,
farmers can often yield 150 bushels of corn per acre, compared to farms
in the under developed world which average about 30 bushels per acre.15

On top of increased fuel prices, there is increased demand for food
worldwide. With rising economic growth in China and India swelling the
ranks of the middle class in those countries, there is increased demand
for meat. Every kilogram of beef produced requires 10 kilograms of
grain, and each kilogram of pork requires about 4.16 This grain is
being diverted to animal feed, or the land is being diverted away from
human food production to animal food production.

*Food for Cars*
Other food crops, especially corn, and soy to a lesser extent, are also
being diverted to bio-fuel production. Last year a record 13.1 billion
bushels of corn was grown in the US on 85 million acres; 22% of that was
diverted to ethanol production.17 US farmers get a 51 cent tax credit
per gallon of ethanol produced. The current farm bill in Congress will
likely decrease this to 45 cents, but this is unlikely to have a major
effect on the colossal production of ethanol from corn. This push for
bio-fuels is a huge subsidy to big corn growers and not necessarily a
greener source of fuel.

Increased demand for corn for bio-fuels will lead to diversion of land
from growing other crops which will in turn increase the cost for animal
feeds and other food production. The UN estimates that the diversion of
corn to bio-fuels has already contributed 10% to the current rise in
food prices, while the IMF estimates it at 20-30%.18 Patrick Schnable,
an agronomy professor at Iowa State University made this point, "Crops
will go to the highest bidder, and we in the western world are willing
to pay more for fuel than poor people are able to pay for food."19

Global warming is also likely contributing a small amount to the price
increase through the effects of climate change on changing crop
patterns. An ongoing drought in Australia for the last few years has
significantly decreased their wheat production.

Finally, financial speculation on food prices has also contributed to
the increase. It is discounted as a significant factor in the capitalist
press. They are very quick to rule it out as a possible contributor to
escalating prices. However, in an interview with the Financial Times
Kemal Dervis, head of the UN Development Program argued, "We are seeing
excessively expansionary economic policies, just as we did when the
dotcom bubble burst" and, "We face a new phenomenon of commodity prices
going through the roof at a time of recession, or at least slowdown, in
the advanced economies.. I cannot help feeling that liquidity in the
system is looking for an outlet." 20
Speculation Fuels Runaway Prices

An important element of capitalism is that it always seeks to maximize
its profits. The current housing and credit crisis means that real
estate is not as attractive as a source of profits, and consequently
food futures have become more appealing. Food futures, which are the
basis of this speculation, are when food is bought before it is
harvested and delivered. Those who buy the futures at one price can turn
around and sell at whatever the market price is later. There is a huge
speculative element in this, as those buying the food futures are hoping
that food prices will rise. Tim Hannagan, a senior grain analyst from a
major Chicago trading company said, "I've never seen a rice (futures)
market until this year in my three decades of trading grains." 21

Middlemen stand to make huge amounts of money, just as we have seen in
recent years in the housing market. Grains are being stockpiled, not
just by traders, but by governments, which fuels panic buying and
further increases the mammoth potential for profiteering. Around
Christmas of 2007, fuelled by the low dollar, investors staged a run on
the US wheat harvest. The price skyrocketed.

Jeff Voge, the Chairman of the Kansas City Board of Trade, said, "We
have never seen anything like this before. Prices are going up more in
one day than they have in entire years in the past. But no matter what
the price there always seems to be a buyer. this isn't just any
commodity. It is food, and people need to eat." 22

Meanwhile, according to the European Commission, two-thirds of the
recent rise in food prices can be attributed to increased costs of
ingredients. Bread increased 10% between February 2007 and 2008, but
doubling the price of wheat should only have led to a price increase of
3%. From their report, "energy, transport, and labor costs have risen.
But it is possible that somewhere along the food chain someone may be
doing well out of this." 23

*Short Term Perspectives*
There is no perspective for a short-term decrease in food prices. None
of the fundamental causes are likely to change soon. Financial Times
analyst, Martin Wolf, argues, "prices are likely to remain relatively
elevated, by historical standards, unless (or until) energy prices
tumble."24 It is hard to imagine any perspective of energy prices
tumbling. Energy is likely to continue to become more expensive. This
will, in turn, increase world wide suffering, poverty, starvation, and
social unrest, particularly in the under developed world, but capitalism
will continue to push to maximize profits as long as it can get away
with it.

Increased prices of their commodities will still fail to help poor cash
crop farmers, and the general price increases will only make it harder
for them. In fact, Kemal Dervis, the UN development notes that "we have
been saying Africans cannot grow food or cotton because of low world
prices, in a sense, there is an opportunity here. But on the negative
side you have to remember that higher energy prices affect the prices of
fertilizer and other inputs. Farmers cannot produce more because the
inputs are so expensive." 25

Once again we are facing the undeniable fact of capitalism that there
will always be an underclass, and those on the bottom need to stay on
the bottom for capitalism to maximize its profits.

*Capitalism's Alternative*
Capitalism's solutions to the global food crisis would be aimed at the
preservation of the market and maintaining maximum profits. Their
answers would include an increased use and reliance on genetically
modified foods. In Japan, where the population has a deep aversion to
genetically modified foods, manufacturers have started importing GM
foods for use in processed foods for the first time.26 The capitalists
will push also to eliminate subsidies and tariffs to decrease
regulations and allow the market to "work things out". This will be at
the expense of poor countries and to the benefit of richer ones.
Big Business will also push to increase production per acre, which is
more energy and water intensive, more chemically reliant, more
destructive to the environment, and ultimately unsustainable.

The market is driven by profits and ignores the needs of humanity. It
depends on and perpetuates massive imbalances and inequality worldwide.
To solve the global food crisis the market system itself must be
destroyed.

In the midst of rising global food prices there is also extreme global
caloric imbalances with massive levels of starvation in the under
developed world and unprecedented levels of obesity in the developed
world. Calories are put into the global market place and then they
follow the Dollar or Euros. In the developed world it is common to throw
food calories away. Bulimics flush them down the toilet, while others
exercise hard to get rid of them. Capitalism pushes them our way and we
are desperate to get rid of them. Meanwhile there is brutal starvation
and malnutrition across the entire globe. As long as the market exists
the imbalance will continue.

We also need to focus on decreasing consumption in developed nations,
not just of unnecessary calories, but also of consumer goods. A change
in lifestyles will decrease the general strain on global resources,
making more resources available for food production.
*
Socialism, Democracy and Ending the Market*
By replacing capitalism with democratic Socialism we can begin to plan
food production according to the needs of people worldwide and with a
better understanding of resources worldwide to try to decrease the
global shipping of food. This may mean any of the following: do we eat
foods only when they are locally in season? Do we only eat foods grown
in our geographic area? Do we discourage development in places such as
deserts where there is inadequate soil and water to produce enough food
to support large populations? Do we try to increase food production
within urban areas. These questions need to be discussed, and will only
be seriously taken up once the market itself is eliminated.

Cuba, after the fall of the Soviet Union, lost access to cheap Soviet
oil, and essentially became close to a post-petroleum economy. As
combine harvesters were left to rust, wheat production collapsed and the
caloric intake of Cubans also collapsed. In response the Stalinist
regime led the development of infill urban organic gardens all over the
island. These were able to produce a massive increase in food for the
population. Local organic gardens in Havana supply 90% of all the fruit
and vegetables consumed by the city's two million residents.27
Similarly, where lawns were abandoned for agriculture during World War
Two, Victory Gardens provided the US with 40% of all its vegetables. 28

We can see that under democratic socialist planning there is a
perspective to better provide for the world's food needs in a way that
capitalism has failed to do. Big business will never be able to feed the
world because the profit motive can never be separated from capitalism.

Sources
Business Week 5-12-08 Solutions for a Hunger Crisis (1,19)
Business Week 5-1-08 What Spurred the Run on Rice? (2,13,14, 21)
Business Week 5-1-08 Is Ethanol Getting a Bum Rap (3,15,17)
Mgex.com (4)
Financial Times 4-26-08 UN says Oil Rise Hits Food Prices Harder (5,18)
Business Week 5-12-08 Food Emergency: On the Front Line with the U.N.'s
Josette Sheeran (6,11)
Voanews.com (7)
Financial Times 5-7-08 Mideast Reels as Hunger Outgrows Oil Revenues (8)
Financial Times 5-12-08 UAE Investors Buy Pakistan Farm Land (9)
World Bank 2008 World Development Report (10)
Financial Times 4-30-08 The Food Crisis is a Chance to Reform Global
Agriculture (12, 24 )
Earthsave.ca (16 )
Financial Times 5-7-08 Warning over Dangers of Inflation for World's
Poor (20,25)
Washington Post 4-27-08 The New Economics of Hunger (22,26)
Financial Times 4-30-08 Food Prices Have Risen Faster Than Justified,
Argues Brussels (23)
The Independent 8-8-06 The Good Life in Cuba: Havana's Green Revolution
(27)

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

Powered by Drupal - Design by Artinet