Links needs your support! Donate what you can!
Click on Links masthead to clear previous query from search box
Recent comments
- Eustacius: "That is an
19 hours 56 min ago - Some comments from Louis Proyect's posting of this article
1 day 33 min ago - escalating commitments
1 day 3 hours ago - Another socialist left is possible -- a reply to Paul D’Amato
1 day 3 hours ago - Response to 'you say...'
1 day 12 hours ago - you are welcome
2 days 6 hours ago - A new movement - a moral imperative.
2 days 6 hours ago - Thanks to Pham Binh for
2 days 15 hours ago - agreed
4 days 2 hours ago - Some differences matter more than others
4 days 6 hours ago
Zimbabwe socialists: `No to a government of national unity! Only united mass action will defeat Mugabe!
By the International Socialist Organisation of Zimbabwe
* * *
June 23, 2008 -- After the publication of the original article (see below), Movement for Democratic Change presidential candidate Morgan Tsvangirai held a press conference at which he issued a statement to the effect that the MDC is pulling out of the presidential run-off election because conditions for a free and fair election do not exist, [due to the] the massive violence against his party and civic society. The press conference followed the disruption of his final rally in Harare by ZANU-PF vigilantes on June 22. Tsvangirai stated that the MDC was to carry out further consultations and would announce the details of the way forward.
We welcome
the position taken by the MDC, and initial reports indicate that this position
has been accepted by MDC and civic society activists and supporters.
However,
this decision needs to be followed by quick and concrete steps on the way
forward, based on a united-front and mass-action strategy, as indicated [in the
earlier article below]. We are [aware] that sections of the bourgeoisie, the
Rhodesian right wing and the imperialist West will not be happy with this
decision, seeing it as a premature surrender and may even put pressure on the
MDC to rescind the decision.
Taking
advantage of the
This has
put the regime in a quagmire but it is likely to continue with its sham
election to gain legitimacy. Legally, it may invoke provisions of the electoral
laws which stipulate that withdrawal can be no later than 21 days before the
election and that in any case standing in the run-off is by law for the top two
contesting candidates. The key therefore is to launch an immediate political
program of delegitimisation of the run-off election, locally, regionally and
internationally.
Regroupment
of civic groups and the establishment of the united front of resistance of the
opposition and civic society has therefore now assumed paramount importance.
This is more so because of the massive likely pressure on the MDC to now enter negotiations
for a government of national unity from South African president Thabo Mbeki, the
Southern African Development Community (SADC), the UN and the capitalist and
imperialist forces. This is no solution for working people and must be
resolutely rejected.
But given the
MDC’s history of prevarication and the strong influence of capitalist elites
within its leadership, it may not surprise if it ends up capitulating again.
The lessons from
* * *
Precarious security
situation – reign of terror
Since May 1 there have been arbitrary arrests of civic
leaders, starting with the two-week detention of the Zimbabwe Congress of Trade
Union’s president and secretary general. Fourteen WOZA [Women of Zimbabwe
Arise] leaders were detained for nearly a month for protesting the delay in
releasing the election results. Two of their leaders, Jenni Williams and
Magodonga Mahlangu, remain detained in Chikurubi Prison. Also arrested and
harassed are church, student and NGO leaders and teachers.
NGOs and social movements have effectively been closed down
by the regime, despite assertions to the contrary. Over the past week, state
agents have moved door to door at NGO offices, forcing them to close or
confiscating computers and files. [There have been raids] on the offices of
ZimRights, the National Constitutional Assembly (NCA), Zimbabwe national
Students’ Union (ZINASU), Padare/Enkundleni/Men’s
Forum on Gender (Padare), Bulawayo Agenda, the Crisis Coalition, the Combined
Harare Residents’ Association (CHRA) and the International Socialist
Organisation (ISO). Humanitarian NGOs providing food relief, medicines and
support to HIV-AIDS patients have been particularly hit.
ZANU-PF bases have been set up in townships where MDC and
civic groups activists are being forced to attend night vigils and/or
assaulted. Several of our ISO members from Mbare, Sunningdale, Epworth and
Chitungwiza have had their houses raided, forcing them to flee while others
have been brutally assaulted. Tec Bara, the ISO Harare gender coordinator and
Zimbabwe Social Forum national deputy convenor for gender, is currently
hospitalised after being brutally assaulted at her home. Three of our Mutare
comrades were also assaulted and brutalised. A Women Coalition’s hostel in
Kambuzuma housing fleeing women and their children was raided and people forced
to flee. In Budiriro, the national deputy leader of the ``war veterans’’, Joseph
Chinotimba has turned an HIV-AIDS clinic into a war chamber.
The MDC is receiving the brunt of the attacks. Tsvangirai
has been repeatedly arrested, his rallies banned and campaign buses and
vehicles impounded. The MDC is totally blacked-out from the state-controlled
daily newspapers, radio stations and TV, while under Operation Dzikisai Madhishi, people are being
forced to remove satellite dishes from their homes. Detained MDC secretary
general Tendai Biti faces treason charges, carrying the death penalty. This
past week in
Operation
MakaVhoterapi
ZANU-PF has virtually closed off the rural areas from the
opposition under Operation MakaVhoterapi
(`Operation Where Did You Vote’). As presidential spokesperson, G. Charamba put
it:
``Fundamentally, MDC
cannot win the runoff; will not win it… Unlike in March, rural
There are three basic objectives behind the regime’s crackdown.
First, so ZANU-PF can win the crucial presidential elections by any means
necessary. As we previously argued in September 2007: ``the chances of an opposition victory are slim… as in 2002 and 2005, the
opposition is deluding itself. The playing field is so stacked against them and
they have very little counter measures to these, as ZANU-PF itself for instance
had in 1980. The entire state machinery, including the media, is being mobilised
to ensure a ZANU-PF victory by hook or crook… war veterans and chiefs are being
mobilised to make the rural areas a no-go area for the opposition.’’
Will ZANU-PF’s
strategy work?
Increasingly, over the last few weeks, an election that MDC
was clearly poised to win has turned and a Mugabe ``victory’’ is now the most
likely result as the MDC structures are decimated and the rural population
bludgeoned and starved into submission. Peasants are correctly aware that the
ward-based system of voting will make it easy for ZANU-PF to identify villages
that vote against them and exert revenge.
Various reports indicate the game plan. Known MDC activists
will be forced to plead illiteracy and be accompanied by senior ZANU-PF village
leaders, who will ``assist’’ them in voting. The day after elections, all
villagers [will be] ordered to assemble near counting stations and await
results so that it can be confirmed that they have truly repented. This is
exactly what Charamba means, when he says the structures of war have now been
resuscitated in the countryside. The crackdown is also designed to neutralise
any potential centres of resistance to a Mugabe ``victory’’, which this time
will be quickly announced.
The MDC and civic society are paying a heavy price for
failing to heed warnings not to take the election route as their principal
strategy for achieving change rather than a central strategy of mass action
centred around a fighting united front of the opposition, civic society and the
labour movement demanding a new democratic constitution before any elections.
The ZAPU [Zimbabwe African People’s
At best, elections should only have been used as a secondary
tactic to mobilise people for the central strategy of mass action. Capitalist
elites who have used their money to commodify our struggles and worm their way
into leadership positions in the opposition and civic society stopped this and
built false illusions around the elections and marginalised the activists who
built the party and are today sorely needed.
Even if ZANU-PF loses, Mugabe has declared that he will not
hand over power to the MDC but rather go to war -- Hatingaregi nyika yakauya neropa ichitorwa ne penzura, tinoda kuona
kuti chakasimba chii gidi kana penzura (``We cannot let go a country that
we won through the barrel of a gun by a simple vote – we will see which is
stronger – the gun or a pencil.’’) A radio report on Power FM quoted Mugabe
declaring at a rally -- ``If you thought Hitler is gone, then you are mistaken,
because Hitler is not only back but back here in Zimbabwe.’’
The second objective is to recapture the parliamentary
majority for ZANU-PF by convicting MDC-elect MPs or forcing them to flee. As
Charamba says: ``They are on the run, but will not run much longer. That may
mean several by-elections which (Tsvangirai) knows he will not win.’’
Indeed it is likely that by the time parliament convenes,
enough opposition MPs will either be in detention or have fled to give ZANU-PF
the majority to elect both the speaker of the House of Assembly and president
of Senate despite being the minority party.
The third objective is preparation for a ZANU-PF-dominated
but neoliberal and pro-business government of national unity with the MDC after
the elections. In our September 2007 perspective we stated that because of the
imploding economic crisis and ``despite his rhetoric, Mugabe is now ready to
capitulate and enter into an elitist compromise deal with the MDC, the West and
business. But only after the 2008 elections, which he hopes to use to legitimise
his party’s claim to being the senior player in such alliance, deal with his
party’s succession problem as well as protect his legacy, person and family
besides his little burial plot at Heroes Acre.’’
Many of his top officials have indeed been quoted suggesting
the GNU is an indispensable option to deal with the Zimbabwean crisis. The crackdown
is designed to force the MDC into such a GNU and preempt any potential
resistance from its radicals or civic society. This is worsened by power
struggles in the opposition ahead of its congress next year. Today many of the
cowardly elites who have wormed their way to the top in the opposition will, as
we have been warning for over two years, gladly accept the GNU, with the
support of business, Mbeki, SADC and most of the West, fearful of the further
radicalisation of the Zimbabwean crisis.
ZANU-PF tactics are thus working. Already the MDC is now
totally silent, even in its urban township strongholds, as ZANU-PF holds sway.
As one comrade said, “ve MDC tapeta miswe”
(the MDC has put its tail behind its legs). Even civic groups that have not
been raided are now stampeding to close down their offices. Fear stalks the
nation one week before the election.
Way forward : Mobilise
for united front for democracy and mass action
The first and most important thing is to confront the veil
of fear that threatens to suffocate us. The defiance of the closure of offices
by several NGOs is correct. Even if the regime closes our offices, we must not
allow it to close down our movements -- underground alternatives must be
urgently built. But no one group can withstand this pressure alone. We need a
united collective response. This is why for the last three years and at the
People’s Convention we were calling for the need to build a radical united front
of civic groups, the labour movement and the anti-capitalist movement,
autonomous of the MDC, even if working with it. One capable of initiating
united front-based mass actions without necessarily being subordinated to the
MDC. And one based on a pro-working people and anti-neoliberal/capitalist
ideology.
At the Convention we unfortunately allowed our tactical
differences on whether to support or boycott the March elections to divide us
and stop us from the bigger project of building such united front. Today we all
pay a heavy price. But it is not too late to regroup, reorganise and offer
leadership in action along with the MDC. Even under this crackdown we can
regroup, initially on a defensive program of solidarity for those under attack
and in self-defence and counter-attacks where necessary.
Most urgently we call for a summit of leaders of the opposition
and civic society to set up a united front of resistance. We believe that such
united front must be totally rooted in and organise around the bread and butter
concerns of working people, including peasants and the unemployed, as opposed
to the wealthy capitalist elites in business, locally and internationally.
Indeed the very origins of the MDC (and similar movements in
the global South) lie in the massive protests of the late 1990s against poverty
induced by the Mugabe regime’s neoliberal capitalist program of ESAP
(structural adjustment). A new and powerful aspect of the MDC’s campaign in the
March elections was an emphasis on such bread and butter issues of the ordinary
people. Any struggle against the regime that fails to do this will be
outflanked on its left by this crafty regime, which has shown, most powerfully
around the land question, a strong capacity to cynically manipulate the poor’s
concerns to remain in power and demonise the opposition as a stooge of the West
and the business class. Without such a united front and a pro-poor, pro-working
people and anti-capitalist ideology we shall not prevail against this regime.
The Peoples Charter of the People’s Convention offers a powerful starting
point.
One of the first things to do is to convene a massive united
front rally for democracy in the centre of
On the election, our preferred position as the ISO has been
to boycott any fake elections without a new constitution and deny the regime’s
elections any legitimacy. The alternative is for a regrouped united front of
civic society and the opposition to launch a serious and determined program of
civil disobedience and mass action, supported by regional and international
solidarity from working peoples and progressive movements. Indeed over the next
week the MDC leadership has a huge decision to make about whether to continue
participating in a sham election designed to clothe a dictatorship in legitimacy,
or withdraw, regroup and lead a fightback of mass action and civil
disobedience. However, if the MDC still decides to continue running. The ISO,
in view of MDC’s massive performance in the March parliamentary and
presidential elections and the desire of many Zimbabweans to vote, has now
modified its position to call for unconditional but fraternally critical
support to Tsvangirai.
Our criticism is what we perceive as the increasing
domination of the party leadership by capitalist and Western elites and the
marginalisation of workers and radicals. This will lead to its likely pursing a
neoliberal capitalist agenda if it assumes power, to the detriment of working
people. And secondly its disastrous strategy of relying on the electoral route
rather than mass action. But the Mugabe regime is driving us into hell and the
people need some breathing space in order to reorganise and resume our battle
for real democracy and against the capitalist and imperialist bloodsuckers.
We therefore urge all our members, supporters, allies and
working people in general to defy the regime’ intimidation and go out and vote
in the election for Tsvangirai. However voting must only be seen as a tactic to
keep the flames of the movement alive and to use the space to organise and
mobilise for all out people’s mass action before and after June 27, and not as
the central strategy for change. The defeat of ZANU-PF in March shows how much
the masses now want change. Even today in the midst of the onslaught,
opposition activists at the local level have organised themselves and are
fighting back in places like Epworth, Bikita, Zaka and Chimanimani. But these
are isolated actions, easily crushed unless more central leadership is offered.
The spirit to fight in civic society is still there. Indeed, when an ISO
delegation visited the imprisoned WOZA leaders this week, we were impressed by
their high spirits despite the very harsh conditions, including being denied
jerseys [jumpers] in this biting winter. Or the many maimed and displaced MDC
activists who are vowing that despite all they are still going to vote against
the regime come June 27.
At the same time under no circumstances must we agree to the
GNU sell-out idea. There can be no marriage with such a murderous regime -- we
must consign it to its true destiny -- the dustbin of history. The GNU is a
project for the dictatorship to perpetuate itself and for the capitalist and
the imperialist elites to ensure that the poverty that the capitalist ZANU-PF
government started with its ESAP is perpetuated forever, but now buttressed by
a working-people supported MDC. It’s time we allow the ordinary people to take
charge of the struggle that is rightfully theirs and ensure an outcome that
achieves real democracy, economically and politically, for the majority and not
just the political and capitalist elites as we have seen so many times in
recent history in the region and internationally -- in Zambia, Malawi, Kenya,
Nigeria, South Africa and Eastern Europe. As our brothers and sisters in
Finally,
ISO wishes to express our utmost gratitude to all those who have sent
solidarity messages and donations to us and other organisations and still make
a further urgent appeal for assistance. To send solidarity messages, receive
updates or make a donation please email us at iso.zim@gmail.com
Shinga Murombo! Jambanja Ndizvo! Smash the dictatorship! Viva
socialism!









Comments
Zimbabwe and the Question of Imperialism: A Discussion
http://www.democracynow.org/2008/6/26/zimbabwe_and_the_question_of_imper...
June 26, 2008 Democracy Now!
AMY GOODMAN: Today, we host a discussion on Zimbabwe.
We're joined in Washington D.C. by Professor Gerald
Horne, Chair of History and African American Studies at
the University of Houston and the author of numerous
books including "From the Barrel of a Gun, the United
States in the War Against Zimbabwe, 1965 to 1980."
Joining us on the phone from Syracuse is Professor
Horace Campbell, Professor of African American Studies
and Politics at Syracuse University in New York, has
written extensively about Pan-Africanism and Zimbabwe.
We welcome you both to Democracy Now! I want to begin
with Gerald Horne in Washington. Can you talk about
what is happening in Zimbabwe and the coverage of it,
how we understand what is happening in Zimbabwe in the
United States?
GERALD HORNE: Well obviously what is happening in
Zimbabwe is quite tragic and I would hope some of the
sympathy that is extended to Zimbabwe could be extended
as well to other African nations that do not have white
minorities. For example, the statement condemning or
questioning the Zimbabweans elections emerged from
Swaziland, a South African nation that is one of the
last absolute monarchies on this small planet. Some
might well question why isn't Swaziland's human rights
situation being interrogated and investigated? A scant
year ago in Nigeria, the continent's giant, you had
shambolic elections, had hundreds killed yet that
barely registered a blip on the international media. At
least not in the North Atlantic. Many talk, perhaps
understandably, about the fact the President Mugabe has
served as President since 1980, but what about Omar
Bongo of Gabon, a close ally of the U.S, an oil-rich
country in West Africa, which of course, he has served
as president since 1967? 13 years before Mugabe came
into power. I mean, I could go on in this vain, but I
think the fact that thousands were killed in Zimbabwe
in the 1980's and yet, he received a virtual knighthood
from Queen Elizabeth and received an honorary degree
from Massachusetts, and yet, today in 2008, he is a
subject of international scorn after of course he
expropriates some white farmers, really speaks of
profound racism in terms of how this issue has been
covered in the North Atlantic media.
JUAN GONZALES: Horace Campbell, I want to ask about
this issue. It does seem that the western media did not
focus on Zimbabwe at all until the expropriations began
of land. But does that deal with--the land of the
white-minority there--but does that deal with the
underlying class conflicts that are obviously clearly
percolating in reaching ahead right now in the country?
HORACE CAMPBELL: Well, thank you for having me on the
show. First of all, I would say this platform on
Democracy Now! is a platform for the progressives, the
left, and those who are involved in the peace movement.
Our discussions on what is going on in Zimbabwe or any
other part of Africa should be guided by how our
solidarity with the peoples of Zimbabwe, with the
oppressed workers of Southern Africa, and in all parts
of Africa can assist our own struggle in this country
against all forms of oppression. And so, comparing
Zimbabwean's oppression with other oppression in Africa
does not excuse the oppression of the Zimbabweans
people by any means. I think Gerald is very right about
these oppressions across Africa, but organizations in
this country that are in solidarity with the peace
movement across the world ,that are in solidarity with
the Zimbabwe people, should take the cue from the
Congress of South African Trade Union that is calling
for a blockade of Zimbabwe because of the oppression.
And I think what distinguished Zimbabwe from those
countries that Gerald speaks about is that none of
those countries is representing themselves as being in
the forefront of liberation. Robert Mugabe and Zanupe
started out like they were Lumumba in the Congo. They
ended up like Mubutu, killing from the people, arrested
opposition leaders, killing people, calling homosexual
pigs and dogs, and killing hundreds, tens of thousands
of people. 18% of the Zimbabwean people are unemployed.
While the stock exchange is the most successful in
Africa. We on the left, in the peace movement, we
acknowledge that George Bush nor Brown have any moral
authority to criticize Zimbabwe because of the unjust
war that they're fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan. But
having said that, we on the left and the progressives,
we must take the moral leadership in having solidarity
with those opposition leaders, those workers, those
human rights workers in Zimbabwe and Southern Africa
who are being oppressed by the Mugabe government.
AMY GOODMAN: Your response, Gerald Horne?
GERALD HORNE: Well I think there is very much to
recommend with what Horace Campbell said. As a taxpayer
to this government here in Washington, my first
approach must be this regime of George W. Bush. And I
think we have to question the hypocrisy of George Bush
who has engaged in questionable elections in Florida
and Ohio, questioning the legitimacy of the elections
in Zimbabwe. More than that, if the situation in
Zimbabwe is so terrible, and I agree it is, why is it
that the Bush administration continues to send
undocumented Zimbabwe workers back to Zimbabwe? There's
been talk about a so-called genocide unfolding in
Zimbabwe, yet, you see the Gordon Brown administration
in London not giving asylum to Zimbabwe workers who are
exiled now in London. We talk about the Mugabe regime,
but just the other day it was revealed that Anglo
American, the major transnational corporation with
close South African ties and headquarters in London, is
about to make a $400 million investment in Zimbabwe.
Barclay's bank is in Zimbabwe. Rio Tinto-Zinc, the
major mineral conglomerate is in Zimbabwe. It seems to
me in the first place, we in the North Atlantic should
be focusing on these kinds of contradictions that we
can affect and as the African National Congress has
said, leave Zimbabwe to the Zimbabwean people
themselves.
HORACE CAMPBELL: Yes, I want to reiterate a point that
any kind of political work we do on Zimbabwe should
assist us in educating our people here so that when the
Zimbabwe political leadership represents itself to say
that it is being persecuted because it expropriated the
land of the former white settlers, we have to
interrogate what did the expropriation of the land mean
for the millions of Zimbabweans workers, small farmers.
It is very clear that the Zimbabwean people needed to
reclaim the land from the white settlers. But the
Mugabe government, when he was receiving his knighthood
from the british government, never negotiated about the
land because throughout the period from 1980-1992,
Zimbabwe had the legal powers to be able to set in
motion the possibilities for strengthening the working
peoples, the farm workers, the women, the plantation
and agricultural workers. And hen we speak about land,
we must understand that whether the land is owned by
white farmers are black farmers, the fundamental
productivity on the land emanates from the labor of the
working people--working people. So our task is how is it
we defend the working people of Zimbabwe? The hundreds
of thousands of workers who live on the conditions of
wretchedness, who have been exploited by the black
capitalist farmers, who are in the Zimbabwean
government just as the whites have done. So any kind of
transition in Zimbabwe must involve strengthening the
rights of the workers, the women, and the use in
Zimbabwe. I think that what Gerald said should throw
away all of the talk about Mugabe been against
imperialism because it was very clear that
Anglo-American, Barclay bank, and Rio-Tinto and diamond
dealers have made billions of dollars while Mugabe was
talking about the land. And what we're calling for is
for any transitional period in Zimbabwe to be one where
there is intervention by the African Union so that the
billions that have been carried out by the ruling
elements in Zimbabwe, that we do not have them carried
out repression of the workers with impunity and then
stealing the money as they have done the past 8-10
years.
JUAN GONZALES: Gerald Horne, I'd like to ask you.
Obviously Mugabe has been an icon and a hero, a giant
in terms of the liberation movements in Africa for
decades. But your sense now, do you believe that he
still represents any forces for progress in Africa or
has he gradually transformed himself into a dictator?
GERALD HORNE: Well, I think that president Mugabe is a
force to be reckoned with in Zimbabwe. And I agree with
those leaders in the region who feel that he and his
party must be contented with if there is to be a
settlement of this controversy in Zimbabwe. I should
also say that with regard to Professor Campbell, I'm
here not to carry a brief on OPS, but they have argued
they did not move on land reform before 1994, i.e. the
date of the South African elections, so as not to
unsettle the situation in neighboring South Africa,
which of course has outstanding land claims of its own.
We all know there are more white farmers killed in
South Africa than have been killed in Zimbabwe. And
likewise, there are outstanding land claims in
neighboring Namibia as well. I think it's
understandable why there has been a focus on on Zanu
PF, but standing in the wings of the opposition of the
MDC and sadly, unfortunately, there has not been
considerable focus on them such as their leaders, Roy
Bennet, a top leader, a former major land owner in
Zimbabwe who of course throttled an African leader on
the floor of the Zimbabweans parliament--I would of
thought that kind of behavior would have ended in
independence in 1980. You have other leading Rhodesians
in the leadership of MDC. One thing that worries many
of us is that if MDC does come to power, there will be
a split and quite frankly, they will pave the way for
the rise of certain retrograde elements like Roy Bennet
come back into power. In some ways, MDC, a trade
union-led movement, is akin to solidarity in Poland
which of course paved the way for the present right
wing in Poland to come to power in Warsaw. So we have
to be careful when we try to butt in to the internal
affairs of a sovereign state. I think our energies
would be best served by putting pressure on this
government here in Washington and its comical sidekick
in London.
AMY GOODMAN: Professor Horace Campbell?
HORACE CAMPBELL: The intellectual subservience of the
MDC and the leadership of the MDC is clear to most
workers in Southern Africa. But this point in the
history of Zimbabwe, the MDC doesn't have political
power. The social forces that are organized in Zimbabwe
against the government have thrown their weight behind
the MDC at the present moment. The Women of Zimbabwe
rise, these are independent organizations, Padari, the
workers, agricultural and plantation workers. I do not
think--we do not have the right to say to the Zimbabwean
workers that your under oppression and therefore, we
should decide for you because of the history of
Mugabe's relationship to the liberation movement, 28
years ago, then we should be saying to you what your
choices should be. In Southern Africa, the Congress of
South African Trade Union movement has called for a
blockade of the Zimbabwean government and is the
Zimbabwe leadership and the Congress of South African
Trade Union which is the largest trade union movement
in Southern Africa is a movement which is calling for
the isolation of Mugabe government. What we agree with
Gerald is on as the falling--the land question in
Southern Africa is an urgent question in the media, in
south Africa, and in Zimbabwe. But having said that, we
must learn lessons from Zimbabwe. To say that when land
his been reclaimed it should not be reclaimed for rich,
black farmers to replace white farmers. Land when it is
being reclaimed in South Africa or in Nambia should be
reclaimed in a condition where there is health and
safety conditions for the working peoples. So yes, we
should take lessons from Zimbabwe and we should
introduce new politics in Southern Africa that is
coming out of the politics of reconciliation. That no
concept of victory should be victory which gives power
to one group over another there should be ways in which
the transition towards a new political dispersion--in
south Africa it is one that strengthens the producing
classes, the small workers, farmers, students. And
these are the forces that have been repressed,
brutalized, the trade union leaders that are in jail
right now in Zimbabwe should be released. Opposition
leaders should be released. Women should be released.
Human rights workers should be released. So that yes,
we can criticize the leadership of the MDC and I have
done so in my writing, in my book, "Reclaiming
Zimbabwe" but the government of Zimbabwe must now arise
in a situation where we provide leadership in a
condition where 80% of the people are unemployed, where
women have been persecuted as prostitutes when a walk
on the streets. Were homosexuals have been called pigs
and dogs and where men go around trying to have sexual
relations with young virgins saying this would prevent
HIV/AIDS. We need a new political leadership to go
against this kind of backwardness that came out of the
kind of patriotic leadership that we had for the past
28 years.
AMY GOODMAN: We wanted to bring South African
archbishop Desmond Tutu into this. He also came out
forcefully against the violence and intimidation in
Zimbabwe speaking in Cape Town Tuesday, who warned
Mugabe should bend to international pressure or could
risk facing universal sanctions and could risk facing
an international criminal court.
TUTU: We are seeing a country not just steadily, but
rapidly going down into chaos. The international
community should, I believe, had intervened long ago
when some of us appeared for a peacekeeping force, to
ensure that people who are not intimidated, people are
not attacked. And that the conditions for a free and
fair election would then have been sustained. Now, I
think obviously the effort should continue where we are
hoping against hope that good sense might get to
prevail and that Mr.Mugabe would agree that really his
time is up. It's 20 years or more that he has been head
of state. I think they've got to tell him he still less
the chance--if he continues and everyone decides to
grant his administration illegitimate, then he stands a
very very good chance of being arraigned before the ICC
for human rights violations.
AMY GOODMAN: Archbishop Desmond Tutu Gerald Horne, your
response both to Archbishop Desmond Tutu and Horace
Campbell.
GERALD HORNE: Well obviously we have enormous respect
for Archbishop Desmond Tutu. But I must return to the
question that should occupy us in the North Atlantic.
Which is why is it the Zimbabwe gets so much focus and
attention on this side of the Atlantic when Paul Biya,
the leader of Cameron a few weeks ago basically named
himself President for life and it barely registers a
blip? Similar situation unfolding in Uganda with Yoweri
Museveni. I think part of the reason, not only the race
and racism question, there's also the question that
many of the former Rhodesian have kith and kin on the
side of the Atlantic. The spouse of Henry Kissinger,
the former U.S. Secretary of State. The spouse of
Chester Crocker, the former assistant Secretary of
State for Africa under the Reagan administration. Even
some distant relatives of George Washington for whom
the city of which I'm sitting is named. Ian Smith, the
former Rhodesian leader of course has relatives in San
Diego. There were hundreds if not thousands of white
mercenaries who flocked to Rhodesia in the 1970's and
1980's to fight against liberation of that particular
country. And it befuddles and baffles me why this kind
of basic historical background is not integrated into
the conversation, integrated into the discourse on
Zimbabwe. I think it gives a very bad impression on the
African continent which leads many Africans to consider
their only focus on the North Atlantic is on Zimbabwe
because there is a white minority and that perhaps
explains to why there has been such a lethargy in
responding to some of the human rights violations that
are unfolding in Zimbabwe. And until that kind of
situation is rectified, I dare say there will continue
to be an uncivil situation in Zimbabwe.
JUAN GONZALES: Gerald, all that being true and we
clearly recognize that disparity in approach and
coverage, back in 2005, there were massive forced
relocations of hundreds of thousands of people by the
Mugabe government that really stunned people, even here
in a progressive community of the United States who
have supported Mugabe and the past. Your response to
those relocations and again to the issue of whether the
government has increasingly become iron handed and
dictatorial in dealing with its own people?
GERALD HORNE: Well, those dislocations were tragic and
unfortunate. I know about them because I hail from St.
Louis, Missouri. And of course it used to be said, with
regard to that city and many other cities, that urban
renewal meant negro removal. That kind of situation is
not unique to Zimbabwe. In Senegal as we speak, there
been tens of thousands of Africans who have been
displaced because of a civil conflict there reaches
back 25 years. It has barely registered a blip on the
international press screen. So yes, those situations
that are referred to in Zimbabwe are quite tragic and
they need to be criticized as well as other analogous
situations. And when those analogous situations are not
criticized, it basically provides fodder for those who
would like to downplay the situation in Zimbabwe.
AMY GOODMAN: Professor Horace Campbell, we just have
about 30 seconds, your response and your summary?
HORACE CAMPBELL: My response is that the government of
Senegal, the government of Cameroon does not represent
itself as a liberation government. The Zimbabwean
government is very aware of the racism that exists in
North America. And it is exploiting that racism and the
antiracist sentiment among Africans in the west in
order to legitimize its repression on the people. The
government of Zimbabwe at this moment is illegitimate
we must avoid war at all costs. Mugabe says only god
can remove him and he will go to war. At present, he is
at war with the Zimbabwe people and we must end the
silence in the progressive and pan-African community
against this type of manipulation and repression in the
name of liberation.
Post new comment