Links needs your support! Donate what you can!
Click on Links masthead to clear previous query from search box
Recent comments
- agreed
20 hours 55 min ago - Some differences matter more than others
1 day 54 min ago - "Voluntarily handing power back to their exploiters"??
1 day 6 hours ago - you say "For the global
1 day 8 hours ago - Question
2 days 5 hours ago - State of left unity in Europe
2 days 11 hours ago - irony
2 days 14 hours ago - Where to now for the United Left Alliance?
2 days 18 hours ago - need sustainable routines
2 days 21 hours ago - Dividing the revolutionaries from the revolutionaries
2 days 21 hours ago
Patrice Lumumba `will live forever’ -- exclusive book excerpt
Leo Zeilig, author of Lumumba, a new political biography of Congo independence leader Patrice Lumumba, has kindly given permission for Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal to offer its readers an exclusive excerpt to download.

* * *
Click HERE to download an exclusive excerpt from Lumumba
Links readers are encouraged to purchase this enlightening and inspiring book. Go to Haus Publishers to place your order. Australian readers can also order the book from Tower Books, Unit 2/17 Rodborough Road, Frenchs Forest, NSW 2086. Phone (02) 9975 5566 or email info@towerbooks.com.au.
* * *
Introductory essay by Lumumba author Leo Zeilig
In a small forest clearing about an hour’s drive from Congo’s southern-most city of Lubumbashi the first prime minster of an independent Congo, Patrice Lumumba, along with two of his comrades, was shot on January 17, 1961. A Belgian officer organised the firing squad; the three bodies were quickly buried, metres from where they had fallen. The following day, another Belgian officer dug up the bodies; cut them into pieces and dissolved them in acid. The assassins were determined to ensure that there would be no trace left of Lumumba or of their crime.
When the news finally reached the world on February 13, 1961, that Lumumba had been killed there was uproar. Protests swept cities and towns across the globe. In Rome, the Italian Chamber of Deputies descended into chaos as demonstrators broke up the proceedings. In Belgrade, protesters shouted, ``Lumumba will live for ever’’. In Shanghai, a demonstration estimated at half a million was held.
Why was there such uproar? Who was Lumumba?
Lumumba was a self-educated nationalist leader. Born in
The Belgian Congo, as it was known, was an inhospitable place. By the 1940s it was emerging from a period of brutal colonialisation. The combination of famine, forced labour and systematic violence had killed more than 10 million Congolese people between 1891 and 1911.
But by the time of Lumumba’s arrival in
Industry was being developed and new mining communities were established across the country. Copper was at the centre of the boom. Produced in huge quantities in the south and mined by the public-private giant Union Minière du Haut-Katanga (UMHK).
The
Arriving in
Apartheid state
The
For much of the 1950s Lumumba’s ideas did not stray from those held by
the majority of the évolués. He was an advocate for the colonial project.
In June 1956 this began to change. Arrested and imprisoned for
embezzlement, Lumumba started to see through the lies of the Belgian rulers, the
cherished ``motherland’’.
Released in September 1957 Lumumba decided to make his new life in the
capital
By November 1958 Lumumba was elected to lead what became the principal
party of national liberation –- the Mouvement National Congolais (MNC). But
Other Western states were also desperate to ensure that
The US State Department would not tolerate any political movement that refused
to privilege the old relationships.
End of
conciliation
Two events signaled the end of Lumumba’s conciliatory politics. He was
inspired by the independence of
The second was more important. On
Congolese society was transformed. Mass meetings took place, strikes spread
and the movement for independence finally broke away from the ranks of the
évolués. Lumumba threw himself into the frenzy. By March 1959, the MNC had 58,000
members.
Lumumba’s militancy rose with the gathering radicalisation. Now he
demanded independence without delay. But other members of the évolués saw their
future in an alliance with the colonial power, and later with the
Arrested, beaten and imprisoned at the end of 1959, Lumumba was only
released when negotiations were launched in
In the negotiations he refused all compromises. The
By the end of negotiations a date had been set for independence:
However the MNC emerged victorious. Lumumba was now the undoubted leader
of
On the day of independence Lumumba reminded his audience of the struggle
for freedom: ``For this independence of the Congo, even as it
is celebrated today with Belgium, a friendly country with whom we deal as equal
to equal, no Congolese worthy of the name will ever be able to forget that is
was by fighting that it has been won.’’
Celebrations were quickly extinguished. In July,
Lumumba attempted to mobilise his supporters. As the power he had just acquired
began to slip away, he turned the ranks of the MNC and those who had propelled
the
But the forces against him and his comrades were too great. Leading militants
of the nationalist movement fell to bribes and cooption. Joseph Mobutu -- the
future dictator of the country, until then an ally and friend of Lumumba – was
openly bribed by the
By October 1960 there were four operations underway to assassinate
Lumumba. Western states openly called for his government to be removed.
Lumumba fled the capital in November and attempted to reach his
supporters in
Less than two months later he had been killed, six months after his
election.
Symbol of
the fight against imperialism
Lumumba’s intransigent resistance to Western attempts to break
Lumumba, in his last months, began to edge away from the politics of
national liberation and to see other forces at work. Francois, his son and now
a political activist in the
[Leo Zeilig is a research fellow at the Centre for Sociological Research and teaches sociology at the University of the Witwatersrand,
* * *
Click HERE to download an exclusive excerpt from Lumumba
* * *









Comments
New evidence shows US role in Lumumba's death
Stephen R. Weissman
1 August 2010
http://allafrica.com/stories/printable/201008010004.html
guest column
Fifty years ago, the former Belgian Congo received its independence under the democratically elected government of former prime minister Patrice Lumumba. Less than seven months later, Lumumba and two colleagues were, in the contemporary idiom, "rendered" to their Belgian-backed secessionist enemies, who tortured them before putting them before a firing squad. The Congo would not hold another democratic election for 46 years. In 2002, following an extensive parliamentary inquiry, the Belgian government assumed a portion of responsibility for Lumumba's murder.
But controversy has continued to swirl over allegations of U.S. government responsibility, as the reception for Raoul Peck's acclaimed film, "Lumumba," demonstrated. After all, the U.S. had at least as much, if not more, influence in the Congolese capital as Belgium. It was the major financier and political supporter of the U.N. peacekeeping force that controlled most of the country. According to still classified documents that I first revealed eight years ago, members of the Central Intelligence Agency's (CIA) "Project Wizard" covert action program dominated the post-Lumumba Congolese regime. However, a 1975 U.S. Senate investigation of alleged CIA assassinations concluded that while the CIA had earlier plotted to murder Lumumba, he was eventually killed "by Congolese rivals. It does not appear from the evidence that the United States was in any way involved in the killing."
It is now clear that conclusion was wrong. A new analysis of the declassified files of the Senate "Church" Committee (chaired by Democratic Senator Frank Church), CIA and State Department, along with memoirs and interviews of U.S. and Belgian covert operators, establishes that CIA Station Chief Larry Devlin was consulted by his Congolese government "cooperators" about the transfer of Lumumba to sworn enemies, had no objection to it and withheld knowledge from Washington of the impending move, forestalling the strong possibility that the State Department would have intervened to try to save Lumumba. I detail this evidence in a new article in the academic journal, Intelligence and National Security, vol. 25, no. 2 (The full article is available from the publisher.)
Here, briefly, are the most important new findings:
Devlin died in 2008 after consistently denying any knowledge of his Congolese associates' "true plans" for Lumumba, and maintaining that he had "stalled" the earlier CIA assassination plot. Yet declassified CIA cables disprove his claims.
One horrible crime cannot, by itself, change history. But the murder of Patrice Lumumba, the most dynamic political leader the Congo has ever produced, was a critical step in the consolidation of an oppressive regime. At the same time, it crystallized an eventual 35-year U.S. commitment to the perpetuation of that regime, not just against Lumumba's followers but against all comers. In the end, Mobutu's kleptocracy would tear civil society apart, destroy the state and help pave the way for a regional war that would kill millions of people.
There can no longer be any doubt that the U.S., Belgian and Congolese governments shared major responsibility for the assassination of Lumumba in Katanga. The young prime minister was an imperfect leader during an unprecedented and overwhelming international crisis. But he continues to be honored around the world because he incarnated – if only for a moment – the nationalist and democratic struggle of the entire African continent against a recalcitrant West.
If the U.S. government at last publicly acknowledged – and apologized for – its role in this momentous assassination, it would also be communicating its support for the universal principles Lumumba embodied. What better person to take this step than the American president, himself a son of Africa?
Stephen R. Weissman is author of "An Extraordinary Rendition," in Intelligence and National Security, v.25, no.2 (April 2010) and American Foreign Policy in the Congo 1960-1964. He is a former Staff Director of the U.S. House of Representatives' Subcommittee on Africa.
This is an interesting text.
This is an interesting text. As a congolese, I am deeply troubled to see that what had happened in the genesis of Congo still happening today. Once again, the US and others instaure and depose congolese leaderdS based on their interests, and at the same time outcrying how corruption and abuse of human rights is crippling Africa. Is it pure ignorance or cynism on their part not to see that the support given to those leaders is used as a green light to abuse and oppress congolese. This kind of oppressive discourse killS congolese by millions, just like congolese massacre during the colonial ear. Poor congolese people! Is it possible for both the west and congolese to benefit from the vast mineral riches of Congo? Why can't true democratic people be supported, leaders who will work for the betterment of their people by using mining-trade incomes without jeopardising the interests of so-called friends in the west. There must be a review of foreign policy towards Congo. The policy that will potray US and others as true friends of congo rather than the opposite. Lumumba killed, Mobutu deposed and died in exile after many years of serving US, Kabila killed. Who will be next?
Post new comment