Links needs your support! Donate what you can!
Click on Links masthead to clear previous query from search box
Recent comments
- New poll shows SYRIZA and ND fighting it out
2 hours 30 min ago - Weekly Worker review of From hero to zero
2 hours 46 min ago - Lenin's Answer
8 hours 40 min ago - Bookchin on Bookchin
11 hours 12 min ago - state of the American socialist left
11 hours 29 min ago - Even 90% cut in U.S. war budget leaves imperialism intact!
20 hours 51 sec ago - Binh, I agree that a sect
21 hours 2 min ago - Cliff vs Fact on Pravda
1 day 4 hours ago - Cuba's Success with AIDS Epidemic and New Challenges
1 day 12 hours ago - How China Communist Party Tops Enrich Themselves
1 day 13 hours ago
Philippines: Extrajudicial killings and the struggle for land reform under ‘Noynoy’ Aquino

Satur Ocampo.
Satur Ocampo, Bayan Muna president, interviewed by Reihana Mohideen
August 11, 2010 -- Some 1205 extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary killings, largely political activists and journalists, took place under the government of former Philippines president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo, according to the human rights organisation Karapatan. In the few weeks since the June 30 inauguration of the new president Benigno “Noynoy” Aquino III, six extrajudicial killings have taken place, three being members of organisations aligned with the Bayan Muna (Country First) party.
Bayan Muna is
an electoral formation and Satur Ocampo
is its president. Ocampo is a former member of the Philippines Congress
representing Bayan Muna, when Bayan Muna topped the 2001 and 2004 party list elections
(the system of proportional representation for the marginalised sectors). Ocampo
headed the peace negotiations panel of the National Democratic Front, allied
with the Communist Party of the Philippines–New People’s Army (CPP-NPA), after
the collapse of the Marcos dictatorship in 1986.
Ocampo
spoke to Reihana Mohideen about
prospects under the new administration of “Noynoy” Aquino.
The character of the Noynoy government
“The
current period under the ‘Noynoy’ presidency is similar to the transition from
the Marcos dictatorship to the Cory [Aquino] government, but to a lesser
degree, in light of the initial statements of Noynoy, [where] there is not much
promise of fundamental change.
“The Cory government
promised to be the exact opposite of the Marcos dictatorship, but change did not
lead to any fundamental shifts in economic development, US relations or the
basic redress of historical grievances. The response of Noynoy, like the response
of his mother, falls short of the reforms necessary for people to feel the
difference in their daily lives. Noynoy is in a similar position to his mother,
[but] Cory at least had the authority to dismantle the martial law decrees,
policies and programs, but didn’t do it.
“Noynoy is
hobbled by having [the former president] GMA [Gloria Macapagal Arroyo] as a
member of the House [of Representatives] leading the opposition, which still
has a substantial number, just less than one-third [of the House of Representatives]. They can
make it difficult for his anti-corruption measures.
“The Truth
Commission [established by the president to investigate corruption charges
under the previous Arroyo presidency] can only recommend actions against GMA and high-ranking officials. It lacks
the authority to act, to proceed [on its recommendations]. It depends on the
Ombudsman [headed by a close ally of the Arroyos] to act on these
recommendations.
“While the
elections gave a mandate to Noynoy, his party – the Liberal Party – does not
have a majority in the House or the Senate. So I also think that Noynoy is being
careful about how he moves… He has opted for the option of compromising.
“His
cabinet clearly represents the interests of big business, especially in people such
as Rogelio Singson (secretary of the Department of Public Works and Highways). His
recruitment pool is very narrow. [The cabinets include] those who served under
Cory, the previous administration, such as the Hyatt 10 [a bloc of right-wing
social democrats who were former cabinet members of the Arroyo administration].
No one in his cabinet represents new ideas. So it’s business as usual, except
that he says that he will do away with corruption.
“His
approach is oversimplified. He does not lay down the direction for economic
planning, how to develop agriculture in relation to industry [and other] key
elements that would answer major problems, such as job creation. He says that job creation will follow with
investments in infrastructure, in post-harvest facilities … but this is
nebulous. … Defence -- he allows the [Armed Forces of the Philippines] chiefs to
articulate policy, without any comments from him on whether he supports it or
not.
The counter-insurgency against the
CPP-NPA
“When he
appointed his new army chief Arturo Ortiz [commanding general of the Philippines
Army], he said that they would defeat the CPP-NPA in three years (GMA said that
she would do it by 2006). The counter-insurgency Operation Bantay Laya
[launched under GMA] targeted both ‘legal’ [activists in the open mass
movement] and armed activists. The ‘theory’ was that in order to defeat the armed
component you had to defeat the political structures – the open mass movement had
to be paralysed and its leaders neutralised. Noynoy has said nothing about this
[Operation Bantay Laya]. Have these operations ended?
“We also
want human rights violations to be a part of the Truth Commission. Noynoy has
not categorically stated his position on the extrajudicial killings. He says
that the six killings so far under his watch will be resolved, but this is only
under his watch and nothing about the preceding cases. It looks like he’s
following in the tracks of the first Aquino government.
“The
criminal cases filed against us [54 persons have been charged with murder,
including the party list Congress representatives and Jose Maria Sison, the National
Democratic Front (NDF) consultant based in Holland] still remain. They said
that I represented the central committee and went to Leyte and gave orders to
cleanse the ranks.[1]
But in 1984 I was still in military custody [in the period that the killings
were supposed to have taken place] and I only escaped in 1985. Then the
military changed the dates … [and] a warrant of arrest can still be issued.”
The struggle for land reform
A key focus
of the struggle for land reform in the country today is Hacienda Luisita, some 6453
hectares of land belonging to the Cojuangco-Aquino clan (Cory Cojuangco Aquino
was a member of the Cojuangco clan). The land is subject to the land reform
provisions of the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Program, a cornerstone land reform
program of the former government of Cory Aquino. The Cojuangco-Aquino clan have
resisted the redistribution of their land to the farmers and workers at
Hacienda Luisita. Some of the main farmers and workers organisations involved
in the struggle for land reform at Hacienda Luisita belong to the Bayan forces.
Ocampo
points out that “Noynoy is very quiet about Hacienda Luisita. He didn’t mention
it in his inaugural address, although during the election campaign he expressed
his desire to redistribute the land, but he was contradicted by his cousin who
is managing Hacienda Luisita. The family does not want to let go of the land.
The Supreme Court is currently reviewing the petition of the family against the
decision of the Department of Agrarian Reform, in 2006, to distribute the land.
When the Cojuangcos acquired the land in 1958 they signed an agreement that
they would hand over the land in ten years, but they did not do so. There are a
lot of problems facing Noynoy and he may not be able to size up the degree of
the problems he faces.”
The Hacienda Luisita struggle for land reform has once again heated up in
the last few days in the lead up to the Supreme Court decision due on August
18. In order to pre-empt the court’s decision and evade the implementation of
land reform the Cojuangco clan have reached a so-called compromise deal with
some farm worker leaders – a deal that provides only a small portion of 1366
hectares of the hacienda for “redistribution option”. Furthermore, the
compromise deal runs against the spirit of the 1987 constitution.
Ocampo
concluded: “We have seven representatives [in Congress]. Our party list
representatives and the mass movement are working on a people’s agenda, for the
legislature and for the long term. If things continue with more of the same
with Noynoy, ultimately we will be at cross-purposes. We are still waiting for
the signals of change.”
[1] In the
mid-1980s the CPP carried out a campaign to cleanse the party of “deep
penetration agents” who had supposedly infiltrated the organisation. The
campaign resulted in the torture and deaths of hundreds of party members.
Recently a grave of several bodies was found in Leyte. The GMA regime claimed
that these were the victims of the “anti-DPA” campaign by the CPP and charged
several allegedly CPP leaders with murder.









Comments
Post new comment