Donate to Links

Click on Links masthead to clear previous query from search box

GLW Radio on 3CR

Recent comments


Syndicate content

British election: Labour Party prefers Tory government than deal with Scottish nationalists

May 2, 2015 -- Irish Republican News, posted at Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal -- With just days to go before a potentially historic Westminster general election on May 7, a further rise in support for the Scottish National Party (SNP) is already creating a crisis in British politics which will likely have implications for Ireland.

Most recent polls indicate that the SNP will sweep almost all of the 59 Westminster seats in Scotland, and is well placed to win the balance of power in London. The development appears to have taken the British establishment by surprise and thrown the opposition Labour Party into chaos.

All but one or two of the 59 MPs elected by Scotland could now be won by the SNP by the time counting concludes, creating a political imperative for independence which is directly comparable to the 1918 "Sinn Fein" election in the aftermath of the Easter Rising in Ireland.

A confused Labour Party leader Ed Miliband told a television election special that he would refuse any pact with the SNP -- even if it meant giving up the chance of power to David Cameron’s Conservatives (Tories). On May 1 he repeated that there would be “no deals or coalitions”.

Depending on the results of the election, his stance means there would be no alternative to a second term under the current British government. According to current predictions, this would also require the support of unionist hardliners in the north of Ireland.

The SNP leader Nicola Sturgeon warned that Miliband is “in denial” about Labour’s need to work with the Scottish National Party in a hung parliament -- not to mention the need to move towards Scottish independence.

But during a tour of cities in Britain, Miliband said: “I’m not going to have deals with the SNP or coalitions. I’m not willing to pay that price because I have fundamental disagreements with the SNP about breaking up the country.”

On the campaign trail, Sturgeon said if Miliband tried to lead a minority government without doing deals with other parties, he would put the SNP in “a strong position to win changes and exert influence” on an issue-by-issue basis.

The SNP leader added: “He sounds as if he might be saying he would rather let David Cameron back into Downing Street than do any kind of arrangement with the SNP. If he is saying that, then Labour have lost the plot.”


In the north of Ireland, Peter Robinson’s Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) are attempting to increase their representation to shore up Tory losses and play "kingmaker" in London. Commentators agree that their pact with their unionist rivals, the Ulster Unionist Party (UUP), is likely to see them increase their representation at Westminster by at least one seat.

However, Robinson is still struggling with a scandal over the extreme homophobic views of his party representatives. Despite the resignation this week of his health minister Jim Wells, the scandal could still undermine any negotiations with David Cameron.

Sinn Fein has also been accused of hypocrisy after defending an election leaflet highlighting how Catholics outnumber Protestants in north Belfast. The party, which has dismissed unionist electoral pacts as a "sectarian headcount", faced the same accusation over the leaflet promoting Gerry’s Kelly’s campaign.

The flier includes a bar chart showing Catholic and Protestant populations in the constituency -- 46.94 per cent and 45.67 per cent, respectively -- and the message "Make the change".

Kelly was condemned by nationalists, unionists and republicans alike for the unusual focus on voters’ religion, a reminder of elections in the 1970s. He defended the leaflet and the use of census figures to highlight “significant demographic change” in north Belfast.

“These official statistics are used widely by individuals and organisations -- academic, media and political -- to predict future political and electoral trend”, he said. “I reject absolutely sectarianism, racism and homophobia and will continue to represent all constituents without fear or favour.”


Sectarian tensions have been simmering over the campaign. Loyalists have been urged to remove election posters by the nationalist parties and “leave them on the ground”, in a message from the Ulster Defence Association (UDA) linked Ulster Political Research Group.

In a Facebook post the North Antrim and Derry branch of the party, which provides “political advice” to the UDA, calls on loyalists to take down any Sinn Fein, Social Democratic and Labour Party or Alliance posters.

And there have been two arson attack on roadside Sinn Fein election billboards.

One billboard promoting candidate Gearoid O hEara in Derry was badly damaged when it was set on fire this week in an attack which mirrored one on a billboard featuring Michelle Gildernew in Dungannon, County Tyrone last month.

O hEara said the incident was not just an attack on his election campaign but an attack on the wider democratic process. “Posters and billboards from all political parties should be treated with respect”, he said.

While Sinn Fein is aiming for gains in Derry, north Belfast and south Belfast, its greatest concern is in Fermanagh/South Tyrone, where Gildernew is defending a margin of just four votes.

The popular candidate is warning nationalist voters that turnout will be key in her constituency, as it will be in many others. She said that unionism appeared to be mobilising in this year’s general election because the Orange Order is playing a key role in supporting the agreed unionist candidates, such as her opponents, Tom Elliott of the UUP.

Fermanagh and South Tyrone usually has an exceptionally high turnout and the candidates and their parties recognise the significance of turning out voters for a successful outcome.

“I think the turnout this time will be much higher on the unionist side because of the work that the Orange Order has been doing in terms of getting people registered, postal and proxy and all of that”, she warned. “Orange halls have been filled with people and activists for weeks.”


Miliband on SNP

"A confused Labour Party leader Ed Miliband told a television election special that he would refuse any pact with the SNP -- even if it meant giving up the chance of power to David Cameron’s Conservatives (Tories). On May 1 he repeated that there would be 'no deals or coalitions'."

This is a surprisingly unintelligent approach from Miliband. He should have been able to turn the tables on both the Tories and the SNP, with a simple argument:

* In the event of a hung Parliament, whoever forms government has to deal with every other party, understanding its position and assessing its leverage through numbers on the floor of the House of Commons.

* The SNP is campaigning the through Scotland from top to bottom, promising that they will have no truck with a Tory government.

* The SNP needs to do this, because there are few Tory votes left to steal in Scotland. They need to take votes off Labour.

* To take votes off Labour, the SNP wouldn't get very far by saying "We don't like the Tories, but we're not quite o anti-Tory as Labour". Instead, they have to say "We're even more anti-Tory than Labour is".

* Once Parliament sits, therefore, the SNP has nowhere to go other than to support a Labour government. Labour doesn't need to make a deal with the SNP, because the SNP's political positioning means that Labour gets all the benefits of a confidence & supply agreement, without the dowside of having to make commitments. In relation to the SNP, Labour will be in a position of considerable strength.

* Finally, what will keep the SNP on side is the knowledge that, if they bring down the Labour government and put the Tories in, the voters of Scotland will wreak a terrible revenge on them. You can't go around promising to be more anti-Tory than Labour, then let the Tories in - and expect to get away with it. They would face a wipe-out worse than that facing the Liberal Democrats on Friday.

Now, I don't see what the downside of this would be for Labour. On this basis, Miliband could appeal to the voters of England by saying that a Labour government would be a Labour government, not a government beholden to the SNP, while he could appeal to the voters of Scotland by saying that by voting Labour, they get a voice in the Labour government, while if they vote SNP, they will still get a Labour government, but they'll have no voice in it.

Why isn't Miliband saying it? I don't understand.

As a result, I'm puzzled. It's an obvious argument, but it isn't being used.

Powered by Drupal - Design by Artinet