Links needs your support! Donate what you can!
Click on Links masthead to clear previous query from search box
Recent comments
- Even 90% cut in U.S. war budget leaves imperialism intact!
6 hours 15 min ago - Binh, I agree that a sect
7 hours 16 min ago - Cliff vs Fact on Pravda
14 hours 54 min ago - Cuba's Success with AIDS Epidemic and New Challenges
23 hours 6 min ago - How China Communist Party Tops Enrich Themselves
23 hours 18 min ago - word game
23 hours 32 min ago - Saudi Arabia and the hypocricy of geopolitics
1 day 47 min ago - sectarian programs... and structures
1 day 1 hour ago - Chicago anti-NATO demonstrations
1 day 4 hours ago - Classical united front clearly intended for parliament also
1 day 8 hours ago
Honduras: Asking the right questions to reach better answers
By Ricardo Arturo Salgado, translated from the Spanish by Felipe Stuart Cournoyer
August 21, 2009 -- Tegucigalpa -- A lot has been written on the Honduran situation, more in solidarity with opposition to the coup than in favour of it. The media seems to feed on scandalous news -- no blood, no news. Unless what’s involved is a people on the way to liberation...
A few weeks ago I publicly
exposed a potential collapse of the health system in Honduras; today public hospitals
have only four basic medicines. They are being told to make emergency purchases
from pharmaceutical firms owned by golpistas [coup makers]: Laboratorios
Finlay, owned by Jorge Canahuati Larach, who also owns the newspapers el
Heraldo and La Prensa, and is an arms supplier; Elías Asfura, owner
of Laboratorios Karnel, also has various
TV Channels and now owns the once government-owned Channel 8; MANDOFER, owned
by the Andonie Fernández family which also owns Audio Video, a golpista group
that includes Radio América.
This collapse also forces the
coup government to plea for private bank loans at commercial interest rates.
Collateral for these loans is the obligatory bank financial reserve, that is
the guarantors are bank saver-depositors. Basically we are confronting a
process of mortgaging the state, and eventually a catastrophic version of the
“corralito.” (1)
If we stop awhile to think
about it, the pillage the golpistas are literally carrying out not only
shows their brazen ambition and likely their premonition of being close to
their time, but also it will leave President Manuel Zelaya with a desolate
country. Above all, the new government, which will be from the left, will
inherit a grave situation. They are already clearing the road for future
destabilisation.
Meanwhile, we have warned
about peculiar movements among the Zelayaist liberal sector, aimed at obtaining
a preponderant position in the new government. Fortunately, President Zelaya
has made public a communiqué urging his followers to desist, and they have
affirmed they will follow his instructions.
As we should assume, a
division within the National
Resistance Front against the Coup could have terrible results for the people’s struggle. The idea of a
national Constituent Assembly to re-found the country is fundamental; it cannot
be achieved if ambitions for power and for keeping alive the old two-party
arrangement are not abandoned.
I think the situation makes
for a lot of discussion, but concrete facts indicate that President Zelaya will
return to Honduras thanks to an agreement favourable to the golpistas. But
this does not mean that he has given up. Zelaya’s importance today is rooted in
his capacity to influence the outcome of the next elections.
If Zelaya does not return we
are going to boycott the electoral process, and the results of this strategy
are essential. It is difficult to predict how much longer the consensus of
Latin American countries regarding Honduras will hold. Countries like Colombia,
Peru, Panama and even Mexico could break down this fragile OAS [Organization of
American States] consensus. Elections in Chile are just around the corner. A
probable victory of the Chilean right could determine what happens, in a
scenario in which governments of the right would recognise the coup regime.
In the long and medium term,
the imperialist offensive against the advance of popular governments could
realise its first victory in Honduras. It is not accidental that the Yankee
government is delaying any process for resolving the situation. We are mindful that the US Congress
functions as if it were the 19th century, with a sizeable group of members who
still hate Lincoln for the abolition of slavery. They are susceptible to lobbying
by a highly paid political clique of coup-making businessmen.
We Latin Americans cannot and
should not fall into this trap. They have tried to distance President Zelaya
from President Chávez but they cannot take
away his convictions -- that are certainly closer to those of the Venezuela’s
Bolivarian president than to those of the sadly celebrated Alan García. Our
president is important, but not because of the fourth ballot box [cuarta
urna (2)] That consultation took place on June 28 [the day of the coup]. When they carried out the coup, the
consultation was ended. Today, three-quarters of the population want to see the
country re-founded.
For that reason, it is
imperative to press within the international community for the unravelling of
this crisis. We have made a lot of headway on the domestic front, we have all
kinds of hardships, but conviction is powerful. Although they repress us, we
are freer than coup functionaries; neither Michelleti, nor Elvin, nor Pepe, nor
any other golpista can walk the streets of Tegucigalpa -- now their
prison. (3) The only way they can go out is with a military contingent.
Pressure from sister countries
is still wanting. They have done a lot already, and we thank them for that. But
what is missing is a final offensive. That’s why it’s important to ask the
right questions.
[Ricardo
Arturo Salgado is an active participant in the National Resistance Front
against the Coup, and a Tegucigalpa-based sociologist and researcher. The original
title of this article was ``Formular las preguntas correctas para llegar a las
conclusiones mas acertadas’’.]
Notes
(1) Corralito
was the informal name for the economic measures taken in Argentina at the end
of 2001 by Minister of Economy Domingo Cavallo in order to stop a bank run.
They were fully in force for one year.
(2) La
cuarta urna -- the fourth ballot box refers to a referendum the Zelaya
government tried to carry out on June 28 that would have asked Hondurans their
opinion about a proposal to have a fourth ballot box in the scheduled November
national elections in which people could vote for or against a proposal to hold
a Constituent Assembly in 2010 to reform the national constitution. The expression now stands for the Constituent
process now sought.
(3) Pepe is
Lobo Sosa (presidential candidate of the ultra right Partido Nacional de
Honduras, and Elvin is Elvin Santos Ordoñez, presidential candidate of the
Liberal Party, also ultra right. He is known for his outlandish corrupt dealings.









Comments
Post new comment