Donate to Links


Click on Links masthead to clear previous query from search box

Read Green Left Weekly, our sister publication



Recent comments



Syndicate

Syndicate content

Thailand: When King Pumipon dies ...

Souvenir clock featuring King Pumipon Adunyadet and his mother.

By Giles Ji Ungpakorn

September 25, 2009 -- Many Thais, whether they are royalist ``Yellow Shirts'' or pro-democracy ``Red Shirts'', are waiting for King Pumipon Adunyadet [often spelled Bhumipol Adulyadej in the Western press] to die. It may take years. Their feelings will be different, either positive or negative. This is because Pumipon has influenced Thai society for years. But the issue to discuss is whether this influence is created by others or based on the king's own power?

Most Thais, both Yellow and Red, believe that Pumipon is the most powerful political actor. Many academics like Paul Handley believe this too. But it is not the case. If Pumipon was powerful, like an absolute monarch, when he dies there would be a civil war between those who want to become the next king. That is unlikely.

There will be a power struggle and rivalries, but it will be a struggle among the elites, including former prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra, to see who can use the monarchy for their own ends. After the 2006 coup, Thaksin lost this battle. Maybe he might return to the fight. Among the Yellow Shirts there will also be such rivalries.

When Pumipon dies, my guess is that the Thai army and the conservative elites will hold a gigantic and very expensive funeral for him. Resources which ought to go to welfare and raising wages will be used for this. My guess is the funeral will be at least twice as long as the one recently organised for his sister, which lasted a whole year. Perhaps Pumipon’s funeral will last five years. Extensions of other kingly activities could take the whole thing to 10 years! Pictures of the King will increase even more.

The reason for this huge funeral will not be in order to satisfy “millions of Thais who will be heart-broken by Pumipon’s death”. Many will be celebrating in private. No, the reason for a huge funeral will be in order to shift the propaganda machine into an even higher gear. The conservative elites will be desperately trying to promote and re-promote the ideology of the monarchy. Anyone who opposes the army, or the authoritarian elites who are now in power, anyone who campaigns for democracy, will be accused of lese majeste [insulting royalty] and of trying to “overthrow Pumipon”. The fact that he is dead will be of little consequence.

While all this is going on, the extremely unpopular and disrespected crown prince will be gradually shifted onto the throne. His equally hated mother, the queen, will be there too, but both will be under the larger-than-life picture of Pumipon. We will never be able to forget Pumipon and his so-called “wonderful works”. We will see the crown prince, but the words “Pumipon” will be blaring out from loudspeakers.

If all this propaganda does not work, there will be the lese majeste law, the contempt of court law, the computer law and the internal security law. If that does not work, the army can always shoot pro-democracy demonstrators.

When the generals staged coups or intervened in politics, they were not following the orders of Pumipon. Pumipon has always been shy, timid and lacking in courage and character. Pumipon has no leadership qualities. He goes with the flow. When Thaksin was prime minister, he praised Thaksin. When the soldiers staged a coup, he praised them. His speeches use obscure language so that the elites can make their own interpretations and Pumipon does not have to take any responsibility. He is happy that people crawl to him and he is happy accumulating his vast wealth. The queen and the crown prince have a reputation for being tyrants. Maybe that is so, but they have no more real power than Pumipon.

So when the generals decide to do anything, they stage an elaborate play in order to make us think that they are going to the palace to “take orders”. In fact they are there to “tell” the king what they have already decided to do. Pumipon will nod in agreement or will be unavailable for an audience, depending on the advice he gets from the Privy Council. The advice is not based on decisions made by Prem, the Privy Council chairperson, it is based on the consensus of those in power in the army and outside. After Pumipon’s nod of agreement, the generals come out of the palace and announce to the public that they have “taken orders” from the king. That way they can build legitimacy for their actions and fear to oppose them.

When Pumipon dies, the powerful army will still be there. The tanks and guns will not have disappeared. The raw and repressive power of the conservative elites rests with the army. But the generals will panic because their sole source of legitimacy will have died. That is why they will extend the funeral as long as possible. When Pumipon dies, the generals will still pretend to go to the palace and “receive orders” from the queen and the crown prince. Occasionally, when it is some minor and rather silly issue, there might be real orders and the generals will follow them just to keep the royals happy. But on all important matters of policy, they will be merely informing the royals of their decisions.

If the crown prince is hated and despised by Thais, why would the army promote him to be the next king? If Pumipon is all powerful, why does he not appoint the princess as his heir to the throne? The answer is that Pumipon is too cowardly to decide anything. The army is reluctant to appoint the princess over the crown prince because their false claim that the monarchy is steeped in “ancient tradition” would collapse by such an appointment. Not only that, changing the succession, because the prince was unsuitable, would mean that the monarchy could always be changed and even be abolished.

Do not think for one second that when Pumipon dies, Thailand will descend into chaos. It is and has been in chaos for the last three to four years despite Pumipon. It was in chaos in the mid-1970s. Pumipon is not universally loved by all Thais. Most Thais are Red Shirts. Most Red Shirts tolerate the present king. A few love the king, but most are waiting for him to die. After Pumipon dies most Red Shirts will not tolerate the crown prince or his mother. The queen lost popular support after she openly sided with the [royalist, far-right] Peoples Alliance for Democracy (PAD).

When Pumipon dies, the work of those who want a republic will not be easier. The king’s death will provide opportunities and dangers. The royalist Yellow Shirts will be more desperate and dangerous. But the legitimacy of their actions can be attacked. Democracy does not fall from a branch like a ripe mango. We have to reach up and pick it and at the same time, reach up and pull down the conservative elites and their entire authoritarian system.

[Giles Ji Ungpakorn worked in the faculty of political science, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. He was forced to leave Thailand after being charged under Thailand's anti-democratic les majeste laws. He is an activist with the socialist Turn Left Thailand group. Visit http://www.pcpthai.org/ and http://wdpress.blog.co.uk/.]

Comments

Thailand: When King Pumipon dies ...

I read Dr. Giles's article with a great interest.
Thanks Dr. Giles

The Fate of Thais after Bhumipol die

yes..I quite agree with the Mr Giles analysis of Thailand political situation...since 60 years ago..Bhumipol have play a vital role in promote himself as the political monarchy in Thailand....when he dies soon...the Thais will involved in civil war...

Yellow Shirt Royalist Froth at the Mouth and Fume at Taksin

By Giles Ji Ungpakorn

November 11, 2009 -- Quite frankly, my feelings after reading Taksin’s interview with The Times ......http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article6909258.ece was that he was prostrating himself unnecessarily in front of the Thai royal family and especially the nasty Crown Prince, whom Taksin sees as a shining light for the future. But Taksin is and always has been a royalist, so that was in keeping with his position. As one who wishes to see a republic in Thailand and an end to the corrupt and undemocratic practices of the royalists, I think that Taksin is trying to lead the Red Shirts into a nasty compromise.

Yet the total disregard for truth embodied in the Abhisit government and their semi-fascist PAD allies, means that an interview where Taksin grovels to the Royals can be distorted into “insulting the Monarchy”. The government have tried to block The Times interview transcript and have threatened the Thai media with lese majeste charges if they publish anything about the interview. No doubt this is so that Abhisit and his mates can tell lies without anyone being able to access the original transcript. A bunch of idiots have even made a complaint to the police, demanding that they charge Taksin and me with lese majeste. I am now starting to collect lese majeste accusations like people collect stamps. The only difference is that stamps are sometimes worth something. In the unlikely event that either of us were ever brought to trial in Thailand, the trial would be held in secret to complete the stitch-up. That is how Da Torpedo and Suwicha Takor got long jail sentences.

The Royalists are also frothing at the mouth like mad dogs over Taksin’s friendship with the rather unsavoury Cambodian PM, Hun Sen. What do they expect? The PAD and the Democrats started their anti-Cambodian campaign a few years back when they wanted to whip up ultra nationalist sentiment over an ancient Khmer temple, which clearly belongs to Cambodia. They didn’t give a damn about Cambodia. They just wanted another excuse to attack the Taksin government. No doubt they would love a war with Thailand’s neighbour, so long as none of them or their relatives had to go and die for a bunch of lies.

The present Thai government run by Oxford educated Abhisit and his cronies, and the Thai elite establishment, are instinctive liars and incompetent fools. They would be a joke if they weren’t so vicious and dangerous. That comes as no surprise. But what about the Thai intellectual establishment, the NGOs and the mainstream media? They will remain quite again or froth at the mouth along with their PAD friends. For them, they must believe that the King will live for ever. Therefore we can’t discuss the succession or perhaps a change to a democratic republic. For them we can’t live in peace with Cambodians either. Suriyasai and other PAD extremists think that Thailand is in danger of becoming a colony of Cambodia. What planet do they live on? But there is silence from the supposed educated sectors of Civil Society on this. Perhaps they are all brain-dead?

 Don’t judge Thailand by the bunch of crooks that run the country. Don’t judge Thailand by the pseudo intellectuals who inhabit the universities and NGOs. There are millions of decent and principled citizens in the Red Shirt movement. Thailand will only become democratic and civilised if these ordinary folk take political power.

Computer crime law as lese-majesty substitute

Asian Human Rights Commission
In recent days police in Thailand arrested and charged another person over causing a decline in the stock market by spreading rumours through the Internet about the king's health.

According to news reports, Tassaporn Ratawongsa, 42, a radiologist at the Thonburi Hospital was arrested on 18 November 2009 and charged under section 14 of the Computer Crime Act BE 2550 (2007) with distributing "false computer data in a manner that is likely to damage the country's security or cause a public panic". She is the fourth person to have been charged in this manner over rumours in October about the health of the king that caused the stock market to drop dramatically. The other three are Katha Pajariyapong, 37, and Thiranant Vipuchant, 43, both arrested on November 1; and, Somjet Itthiworakul, 38, arrested on November 3.

The four join the director of online independent news site Prachatai, Chiranuch Premchaiporn, who is facing a raft of charges over comments that readers posted to the site, not anything that she herself wrote or did, by virtue of section 15 of the same law that, "Any service provider intentionally supporting or consenting to an offence under Section 14 within a computer system under their control shall be subject to the same penalty as that imposed upon a person committing an offence under Section 14."

All of these accused face imprisonment of up to five years for their alleged offences. Another Internet user from Thailand who made the mistake of thinking that he had relative freedom to do as he pleased in cyberspace who is already serving his term is Suwicha Takor, who earlier in the year was given a 10-year sentence, reduced from 20 because of his guilty plea, for posting pictures deemed offensive to the monarchy. .............(read more)
Source:
http://www.ahrchk.net/statements/mainfile.php/2009statements/2306

Powered by Drupal - Design by Artinet