By Dave Holmes
When one sees a modern city from the air, especially at night, it is a truly
awe-inspiring spectacle. What always strikes me is the immensity of the
project, a testimony to the power and creativity of human beings. However, on
the ground and actually living and working in this wonder, things are quite
different and the social and ecological problems crowd in and fill one’s view.
The truth
is that our cities have always been dominated by the rich and powerful and
built and operated to serve their needs — not those of the mass of working
people who live and toil in them.
* * *
This
article is based on a talk presented at the Climate Change | Social Change
Conference in Sydney, April 2008. The conference was organised by Green Left Weekly. For more articles, audio and video from the conference, click here.
* * *
Problems of
urban life
And today
the destructive effect on the quality of urban life of the capitalist pursuit
of profits before anything else is growing alarmingly. Here is a short and
far from complete list:
- Modern
capitalist cities are absolutely dominated by cars and the trucks. This leads
to massive, life-threatening pollution and a vast network of roads and car
parks which scars the urban landscape. People live on islands surrounded by
seas of asphalt and concrete — 40% or more of the city surface is asphalt and
concrete. The city creates its own, warmer climate.
- Motor
vehicles also directly kill and maim large numbers of people each year; still
greater numbers die from the pollution. Vehicle emissions are also a major
contributor to greenhouse gases and the climate change which threatens the human
race with utter catastrophe.
- The
corollary of this is that public transport systems are weak and take second
place to the motor car. Similarly, the great bulk of freight is carried by
trucks not rail.
- Developers aided by governments have created the appalling urban sprawl with
all its ecological and social consequences (erosion of farmland, huge distances
between home and work, etc., etc.). The word “developers”, of course, is an
appalling euphemism — capitalist sharks would be a more accurate description.
- And now, in
the name of urban consolidation, these same developers are being encouraged to
build their often crappy blocks of units anywhere and everywhere. In Melbourne
this has led to a great deal of angst in the suburbs. And one result is no better
than the other.
- Then
let’s look at what the developers actually construct. Modern houses and
buildings are generally not only hard to maintain but ecologically wasteful and
often extremely unhealthy (emissions from building materials, plastics and
cleaning agents). They could be designed differently — we could easily have
ecologically sensible houses instead of the current extremely wasteful
“McMansions” favoured by the building industry.
- In the
cities, public land — modest though it is — is constantly being alienated by
greedy developers in league with councils and city and state governments.
- Not only
are house prices soaring beyond the reach of most workers, but homelessness is
growing sharply (estimated to be over 100,000 nationally) as governments refuse
to build public housing and rely on the market to solve everything (preferring
to give subsidies to people to rent from private landlords).
- Shopping
centres (malls and supermarkets) dominate much of city life. They kill most of
the neighbourhood shops and force people to rely on cars to do their shopping.
But these juggernauts are purely the result of the capitalist thirst for profit
— they appear before us as facts of life; people never get to discuss what is
really needed. Moreover, the ubiquitous shopping mall represents a serious
privatisation of social space — we all have to use them and they thus fulfil a
social function but access and control is wholly in the hands of the private
owners.
- And as
the supermarkets and malls kill off many of the neighbourhood shops, their
place is taken by chain outlets (7-11, Coles Express, petrol station shops) all
offering emergency supplies — at much higher prices.
- Within
the city we have the hypertrophy — a monstrous swelling — of the city centre
(full of truly ugly buildings all jostling for position) and the bleak
wasteland of the sprawling suburbs.
- In the
sixties, “decentralisation” was a buzzword. Governments encouraged a modest
movement of services and industry to regional centres. But today country towns
and villages are dying as governments cut services and jobs and banks close
branches. This has a multiplier effect. People move to the city (or at least to
the big regional centres) and the rural crisis intensifies.
- There is
a movement back to some regional centres but — under the wonderful capitalist
system we have — it becomes ghastly caricature of what is really needed. The
rich and middle classes build holiday homes in coastal towns forcing up prices
and making life impossible for ordinary people (working-class pensioners and
renters) who have to move elsewhere.
Peak oil
and climate change
On top of
the all the above, as the concept of peak oil and the eventual end of this
finite resource laid down over millions of years gains currency, the fragility
of the modern city is suddenly laid bare. The movie The End of Suburbia
demonstrates very well how the American suburbs have been built on the
automobile. If the motor vehicle as we know it goes — i.e., can no longer serve
as mode of mass transport — then the urban sprawl becomes even more untenable
and an alternative way of living becomes desperately urgent.
Similarly,
climate change has put a big question mark over the modern city. Effecting a
drastic and rapid reduction of greenhouse gas emissions is a life-and-death
question.
In
Australia, perhaps the most dramatic manifestation of climate change for the
cities is the question mark over water supplies. Achieving water security and
sustainability is a burning issue. To date, the main response of state and
federal governments has been to go for big-budget projects (in Victoria, a
desalination plant and a diversion pipeline to take scarce water from the
equally drought-affected Murray-Goulburn irrigation area in the north).
Arguably,
such responses do not address the real problem and will actually make it worse.
(For instance, Victoria’s projected desalination plant will be a major emitter
of greenhouse gases.)
All in all,
climate change calls into question so many aspects of our current urban
existence.
- The motor
vehicle culture which big business has foisted on us is no longer viable (if it
ever was). If declining fuel supplies and ever-more-expensive petrol costs
don’t kill it off, surely climate change will. Public transport systems will
have to be developed to replace it.
- The urban
sprawl especially characteristic of Australian capital cities — which compels
people to travel vast distances to get to work — will have to give way to some
form of consolidation. The hypertrophy of the city centre and the bleakness of
much of the suburbs needs to be overcome. A much better spread of jobs would
mean that people didn’t have to travel vast differences to work.
- In my
opinion, over time the fetish of the ¼-acre block — the equivalent of every
family owning its own car — would start to ease and eventually disappear as people
realised that denser living with radically improved public amenities (parks,
transport, services) had a lot to offer (c.f. some European cities).
- As
currently constructed, our houses and buildings embody huge amounts of water
and energy and considerable greenhouse gas emissions. Moreover, their actual
operation is characterised by a high and unsustainable energy and water
consumption.
- Climate
change will put our food supply under extreme pressure. What foods we eat, how
they are transported and distributed will become burning questions. As well as
finding ways to guarantee our food security, reducing the water and energy
consumed in the whole process will be vitally important.
- We need a
much more uniform distribution of the population over the countryside. At the
very least, the cities must get smaller and the country towns grow. But, unlike
what is happening today, this needs to be done in such a way that jobs and
services move out also, transport access is maintained and actual living
communities are created. In time, the traditional isolation of the countryside
would disappear along with the swollen capital city with its bloated centre.
In this
regard socialists reject the current developer-driven model whereby greenfields
housing estates gobble up precious farmland and create McMansions-style ghettos
on the fringes of the city, isolated and with few amenities, a trap for
housewives and the elderly and a terrific burden for those who have travel vast
distances to work. We can surely work out something much better.
Abandon
affluence?
As an
aside, Ted Trainer, in his 1985 book Abandon Affluence, had a lot to
say on the modern city. But his non-Marxist, radical green framework marred a
lot of the useful points he made.
He saw
“overconsumption” by the West as the source of the global ecological crisis. In
his book he bases everything on reducing consumption.
Marxists,
of course, see the fundamental problem not as “overconsumption” but the
capitalist drive for profits ahead of all else; achieving a relative material
abundance is essential if humanity is to leave class conflict behind and
achieve full communism. With modern technology, it would be quite possible to
achieve relative material abundance and — by improving production processes and
eliminating the wastefulness of capitalist production and society — at the same
time actually reduce our ecological footprint massively.
One can say
generally that the West consumes too many resources but this obscures the
reality that these are class-divided societies and a large proportion of the
population doesn’t consume very much at all. For example, in the United States
there is a huge internal Third World which radically underconsumes the
necessities of life. They are not responsible in any way for the profligacy of
the US — that should be sheeted home squarely to the ruling capitalist
plutocracy.
* * * *
Finding this article thought-provoking and useful?
Please subscribe free at http://www.feedblitz.com/f/?Sub=343373
Help Links stay afloat. Donate what you can by clicking here.
* * * *
While we
oppose the wasteful use of resources and while we too are opposed to capitalist
consumerism, posing the problem in terms of reducing consumption as such is
wrong and would be political suicide for the socialist movement. For instance,
supermarkets, for all their capitalistic form, are actually a tremendous
labour- and time-saving convenience. The liberation of women and the whole
working class has many aspects; a key one is reducing drudgery to the minimum.
We want to go forwards from capitalism, not backwards.
Ted
Trainer’s city of the future has a very definite reactionary, feudal,
labor-intensive feel to it, but even allowing for this rather basic weakness,
he does paint a thought-provoking picture of the new city, with the old
freeways and roads dug up, with vegetable gardens where the factories once
stood, etc.
Monstrous
beast in the room
Making our
cities livable and grappling with peak oil, climate change and sustainability
are really one and the same thing.
Ideally, we
would have a big discussion, develop a rational plan and then organise
ourselves to implement it. If we were, say, a small community living in ancient
times before the development of class society, that is exactly what we would
have done.
But today,
the problem is not that the population has grown but that the economy on which
we all depend — the productive apparatus and everything associated with it — is
not owned collectively by society but by a tiny handful of capitalists. Working
people’s labour operates the means of production — in that sense it is social —
but a few per cent of the population privately own it.
This is the
monstrous, slavering beast in the room. At every turn of the wheel it has to
fed. Its ravenous appetite must be satisfied ahead of any human need. What it
wants — profits and ever more profits — is not what the rest of us want — i.e.,
meaningful action on climate change and other social problems.
For
example, look at what is happening in Victoria right now. The
big-business-oriented Brumby ALP government is moving at high speed in the
opposite direction to what is needed to confront peak oil and climate change:
- Rather
than a massive program of fitting all dwellings with water tanks and recycling
systems, imposing conservation targets on industry and agribusiness, and
establishing the infrastructure for large-scale stormwater capture, it has
signed off on the desalination plant and the northern pipeline — bonanzas for
big business but a disaster for the rest of us. Water bills for ordinary
households are projected to double within five years.
- Rather
than a program to phase out our disastrous dependence on brown coal and make
the switch to renewable energy, the ALP government is intent on pursuing the
mirage of “clean coal” technology. (As someone said, this will turn the Earth
into a giant soda fountain.) Power prices are also set to double for ordinary
users over the next few years.
- It
refuses to put the necessary resources into public transport which exists in
absolutely infuriating and permanent crisis; instead its program is roads, more
roads and still more roads. Now it is inching towards a truly insane monster
road tunnel under Melbourne’s general cemetery. Not even the dead are to be
left to rest in peace!
- It is
going ahead with a radical dredging of Melbourne's Port Phillip Bay which, among other
things, threatens to lead to the flooding of low-lying suburbs at high tide.
And all this is so that bigger ships — laden with yet more consumerist crap —
can transit the bay.
- It has
given the go-ahead to GM canola. Brumby’s utterly ludicrous comment was that
this was giving the consumer “choice”! The consumers don’t want this sort of
fake “choice” — they want safe foods. GM was given the green light to give a
profit bonanza to Monsanto and a few big exporters; the rest of us will pay the
price (an increase in allergies and who knows what other long-term health damage).
Public
ownership and planning
In order to
grapple with the crisis of climate change we need a total mobilisation of
society and a drastic and rapid reorientation of our entire economy. But to
imagine that anything can compel a horde of profit-crazed corporations to be
“responsible” is utterly fanciful. The commanding heights of the economy must
be in public hands.
- Socialists call for the nationalisation of the entire energy sector (coal, oil,
gas, the power stations and distribution systems, wind farms, etc.). This vital
infrastructure must belong to the community — whether it is in federal, state
or municipal hands. The charter of this sector must be to phase out the fossil
fuel power plants and make the “big switch” to renewable energy as quickly as
possible.
- The
public transport and freight systems must also be in public hands. The aim must
be to achieve a drastic and rapid reduction in the use of motor vehicles. The
roads should be kept safe; apart from that, massive investments must be poured
into rail, trams and feeder bus systems.
- The
automobile industry should likewise be nationalised. The car plants should be
retooled to produce public transport stock and renewable power equipment.
- As the
crisis of climate change bites deeper, food security will become a big issue
for society. We can’t leave the bulk of the distribution system in the hands of
profit-gouging supermarket chains like Coles and Woolworths, that exploit small
suppliers and consumers alike. They too should be brought under public
ownership.
- The
banks, which underpin the capitalist economy, should be nationalised and a
single state bank created. This would guarantee bank workers jobs, provide
services and generate funds for the reconstruction of the economy.
Economic
planning based on public ownership of the means of production has tremendous
power. Here is just one example.
In 1967
Isaac Deutscher, the renowned biographer of Trotsky, published The Unfinished
Revolution, his well-known study of the Soviet Union. He pointed out that if
you allowed for all the years the USSR took to simply get back to pre-war
levels of production (following the World War I and the Civil War and then
World War II), then in the equivalent of a mere 25 peaceful years — from a very
low base — it had created the second most powerful industrial economy in the
world.
Put aside
Stalinist bureaucratism and repression, the deliberate neglect of consumer
needs in favour of heavy industry, and the damage to the environment — this
example nevertheless shows the enormous power of collective labour, once it is
freed from the shackles of capitalism and allocated according to a conscious
plan.
Fight for
the future
Of course,
the capitalist class has immense power and wealth and will not give it up
without a tremendous struggle. Only the growth of a vast popular movement,
solidly based on the great working-class majority, can succeed here. The
development of a movement to fight for meaningful action on climate change will
at the same time prepare the political conditions for a workers government
which will finally bring the economy under collective ownership and control.
This — and
only this — will enable us to begin to construct a society based on the
fulfilment of human needs and living sustainably in harmony with nature.
Dave Holmes is a member of the Australian
Democratic Socialist Perspective, a Marxist tendency within the Socialist
Alliance.
Urban design
Changing the way people live is difficult and should be done by giving them options instead of compelling them to live in the way a few experts decide.
Although some people can live without any contact to nature and with few positions, most need a less densely populated environment with adequate living and storage space.