Soviet Union
Slideshow: Stalinism -- How did the Russian Revolution degenerate and was it inevitable?
Baruch Hirson: The South African left and the Russian connection (1991)
Click HERE to view a CVET video production of a seminar at the
University of the Western Cape on the past, present, and future of
Marxism in South Africa, held in September 1991. It was addressed by veteran South African Trotskyist activist Baruch Hirson. Participating in the seminar were Ciraj
Rassool, Baruch Hirson, Andrew Nash, Colin Bundy, Adam Habib, Paul
Allen and Neville Alexander.
Baruch Hirson: The South African left and the Russian connection (1991)
September 6-8, 1991
Che Guevara's final verdict on the Soviet economy
By John Riddell
June 8, 2008 -- One of the most important developments in Cuban Marxism in recent years has been increased attention to the writings of Ernesto Che Guevara on the economics and politics of the transition to socialism.
A milestone in this process was the publication in 2006 by Ocean Press and Cuba's Centro de Estudios Che Guevara of Apuntes criticos a la economía política [Critical Notes on Political Economy], a collection of Che's writings from the years 1962 to 1965, many of them previously unpublished. The book includes a lengthy excerpt from a letter to Fidel Castro, entitled ``Some Thoughts on the Transition to Socialism''. In it, in extremely condensed comments, Che presented his views on economic development in the Soviet Union.[1]
In 1965, the Soviet economy stood at the end of a period of rapid growth that had brought improvements to the still very low living standards of working people. Soviet prestige had been enhanced by engineering successes in defence production and space exploration. Most Western observers then considered that it showed more dynamism than its US counterpart.
¿La Unión Soviética, estado sin partido?
Reseña crítica de Alex Miller
El siglo soviético
por Moshe Lewin
Verso 2005
416 páginas
Los medios comerciales y las élites intelectuales capitalistas han promulgado un estereotipo sobre la Unión Soviética: una línea ideológica directa y sin interrupciones lleva del bolchevismo de la revolución de 1917 al totalitarismo del período stalinista (1920-1953), pasa por el período post-stalinista desde 1953 y termina en el colapso del régimen soviético en 1991. Normalmente, se esgrime el estereotipo contra el bolchevismo, y en realidad contra cualquier forma de marxismo revolucionario: se usa el estancamiento y la declinación post-stalinistas, así como las masacres y purgas del período stalinista, para elaborar una reducción al absurdo de las aspiraciones originales de la revolución de 1917.
The Soviet Union: a no-party state?
Review
by Alex Miller
The Soviet
Century
By
Moshe Lewin
Verso
2005
416
pages
'Political capitalism' and corruption in Russia
By Boris Kagarlitsky
Boris Kagarlitsky is a contributing editor of Links. His books include Square Wheels: How Russian Democracy Got Derailed and The Mirage of Modernisation.
Some remarks on democracy and debate in the Bolshevik Party
By Murray Smith
The party reconstituted in 1912
Debates in the Bolshevik Party
Bolshevik debates in 1917 and after
The withering away of Bolshevik democracy
I would like to make some comments on Doug Lorimer's article, "The Bolshevik Party and `Zinovievism': Comments on a Caricature of Leninism", published in Links 24.


Recent comments
48 min 54 sec ago
17 hours 50 min ago
19 hours 1 min ago
1 day 3 hours ago
1 day 4 hours ago
1 day 4 hours ago
1 day 20 hours ago
3 days 2 hours ago
3 days 2 hours ago
4 days 19 min ago