Donate to Links
Click on Links masthead to clear previous query from search box
- Boris Kagarlitsky: Eastern Ukraine people’s republics between..
3 hours 23 min ago
- Global State in Panich-Gindin? Where?
1 day 10 hours ago
- Celebrity revolutionaries v serious commentary
1 day 16 hours ago
- Russian imperialism
2 days 1 hour ago
- TeleSUR: Ukraine fighting intensifies (19/8/2014)
2 days 16 hours ago
- RUTH FIRST´s PLACE IN THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVOLUTION - Part II
3 days 12 hours ago
- Latin American left governments and Sri Lanka
4 days 4 hours ago
- Letter from eastern Ukraine: ‘The collapse of the liberal ‘left’
4 days 17 hours ago
- Who Is Bernie Sanders?
5 days 8 hours ago
- Left Must Resist Ban on UCP
5 days 15 hours ago
Russia: An awakened sense of dignity; December 10: A new page in history
Bolotnaya Square, Moscow, December 10, 2011. Photo by Andrey Kolganov.
By Andrey Kolganov and Aleksandr Buzgalin reporting from Bolotnaya Square, Moscow, translated by Renfrey Clarke
December 16, 2011 – Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal -- Why, after many years when street politics in Russia were deep frozen, have citizens again acquired a taste for street actions? After a public rally near Chistie Prudy metro station in inner Moscow drew 6000-7000 people, what caused 10 times as many to then gather on Bolotnaya Square [on December 10]? (See article below.)
Can it be the crisis? The fall in living standards?
When the crisis first hit, nothing took place to remotely match the recent meetings.
When a crisis first grabs people by the throat, they tend not to go out and demonstrate, but simply try to survive. They can, of course, be driven to complete despair, but what happens then isn’t a public meeting but a revolt, a mutiny, an uprising.
The people who came out onto Bolotnaya Square looked perfectly well off; they weren’t paupers or marginalised, and neither were they the familiar figures you always expect to see at political gatherings (the latter were probably there too, but they were dissolved in the crowd to the point where you didn’t notice them).
Here undoubtedly is the answer to the question “Why?” – because if well-off people, used to standing on their own feet, are systematically humiliated and have their dignity trampled on, they stop putting up with it. People like this won’t suffer endlessly in silence.
It is people of this sort who are now joining in protests on the streets of Moscow. They have been forced too shamelessly, and for too long, to take part in farcical elections where the required percentage of the votes has been achieved by throwing bundles of ballot papers in the direction of the “party of power”; through a “merry-go-round” of voters with suspect credentials; through banishing over-curious observers from the polling places; and through direct forgery of electoral documents. Against the background of such methods, complaints about unequal opportunities for election campaigning seem almost beside the point.
The citizens of Russia have shown they want democracy – and not the kind of charade they have been forced to accept until now, but a genuine right to cast their votes and to be heard. All the organisations that have helped build the rallies or that have attended with their placards and banners have put forward democratic slogans. This is completely correct, since these demands make up the common platform that unites the opposition. Everyone, whatever the precise shade of their politics, needs honest mechanisms for counting citizens’ votes, even if these mechanisms are only a little honest in the early stages.
It’s clear, however, that the people who now hold power intend to spit on the slogans and demands of the opposition.
Do you suppose they’re scared by the noise of meetings, and that they’ll voluntarily start turning out their pockets that are stuffed with the money they’ve stolen from us? If power were to change hands the present authorities could be forced to do this, so they can be expected to stand united in defending the right to thieve, to take bribes, to embezzle and so forth. To really scare the authorities you need to bring out not 7000, and not 70,000, but at least 700,000 people to attend rallies. Where is the opposition to get so many activists?
The opposition will find these adherents if it remembers that in Russia there are people for whom the most important thing is not the way votes are counted, but how to make it through to pay day, how to find a child-care centre for their children, how to get the money to equip them for school and to feed them tomorrow, how to pay for their higher education, and how to buy an apartment at today’s unbelievable prices.
In short, if the democratic opposition remembers the problems that weigh on most of the population, then there is a chance that this majority of people will listen to it and support it. But if it thinks of honest voting solely as a means of winning seats in parliament at the next election, all the steam of protest will be let off through the whistle, and today’s burst of public activism will remain a storm in a teacup. Meanwhile, the opposition so far has failed to provide any intelligent answer to the question of how the ruling elite might be forced to surrender the “right” it has usurped to manipulate the will of citizens. Russia’s rulers will not willingly yield the positions they hold in this area.
What about the political parties that claim to be aligned with the opposition? There were right-wing nationalists on Bolotnaya Square, but the shrill-voiced demagogue Zhirinovsky, who loves to pose on television shows as a fearless teller of the truth (while voting as the Kremlin instructs him), did not put in an appearance. Nor was there any sign of the intelligent gas-bag Yavlinsky, so attentive in his program to questions of rights and freedoms but so helpless when it comes to practical action – though again, plenty of his supporters were at the rally. Mironov, whose “Russian Justice” party plucks at our heartstrings with its concern for the popular welfare – and which meanwhile acts as a loyal opposition for “their excellencies” – was not to be seen either, though Oksana Dmitrieva spoke from the platform.
Finally, the leaders of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation did not show up, though placards of various of the party’s organisations were in evidence. Perhaps Communist Party leader Gennady Zyuganov also likes playing the role of loyal opposition.
Still, we should not be unfair; each of the parties listed here is prepared to show its face at a protest meeting. But how far will they go in their demands, and how radical will the actions be that they are prepared to initiate?
Will these parties, as in the past, stick to the role of obedient, unassuming talk merchants? Most importantly, will they show any desire or ability to unite with the mass of citizens who are not members of political parties in staging actions that put real pressure on the authorities, even if these actions are only on the level of activity of the Occupy Wall Street movement?
Or, will these parties once again set out to lead “the masses” and “the electorate” solely in the hope of being entrusted with a further ten seats in parliament?
[Andrey Kolganov and Aleksandr Buzgalin teach in the faculty of economics at Moscow State University.]
December 10: A new page in the history of Russia
By Ilya Boudraïtskis
International Viewpoint -- Saturday December 10, 2011, was really a historic day for Russian society. According to various estimates, the meeting which was held in Moscow mobilised between 50,000 and 80,000 people; it was the biggest street action since the beginning of the 1990s. The same day, similar actions brought together thousands of people in all the big cities of Russia. The movement even reached Western Europe, where the Russian diaspora organised pickets in front of embassies.
Only a week before, the regime would not have imagined that it would have to face serious problems. The electoral campaign for the State Duma (parliament) was held according to rules that are now well known to everyone, the rules of “guided democracy”, an authoritarian political model whose foundations were laid by President Boris Yeltsin in 1993, at the time of the adoption of the present constitution. It could have been thought that over the last decade Vladimir Putin and his acolytes had succeeded in turning politics into a tiresome spectacle which nearly all of the population felt to be something completely foreign to them.
Scarcely seven unrecognised parties fought to win a place in parliament, but it was a foregone conclusion that the biggest share of the cake would go to United Russia (Putin's party). This party has a monopoly of both state structures and those of the country's big capitalist companies. In order to ensure the victory of this bureaucratic monster, whose popularity is in freefall, thousands (indeed, millions!) of civil servants were mobilised. Every possible mechanism of manipulating the vote and the work of the electoral commission was resorted to.
The growing dissatisfaction with the regime was expressed in a massive vote for parties that were seen as having a critical position with regard to United Russia. Millions of voters applied the principle of voting “for any party, but not for United Russia”. They thus gave their votes to the Communist Party and the centre-left party Fair Russia. On the morning of December 5, when the results of the elections were announced, the country was indignant: United Russia had won 50 per cent of the vote, whereas its real popularity was sharply decreasing, and within the population this party is known as “the party of swindlers and thieves”. The reports published by observers from the opposition revealed that nearly a quarter of the ballot papers had been tampered with to the advantage of the party in power!
Russians have the feeling of having been personally insulted and ridiculed, which comes on top of the increasingly obvious consequences of the economic crisis, with glaring poverty and the privatisation of the social sector. On December 5, more than 7000 people went to the meeting organised in Moscow by political groupings calling for democratisation. The demand for “fair elections!” quickly gave way to the slogan “Putin -- resign!” and at the end of the meeting violent confrontations took place between the police and participants. Within a few days, the conflict spread and grew stronger and young people organised through social networks tried to take unauthorised actions in the city centre; they were followed closely and savagely dispersed by the police.
On December 9, nearly 1000 people were arrested during such actions in Moscow and St Petersburg. Finally, on December 10, the level of discontent reached its highest point. What happened that day can already be considered as a point of rupture in the history of modern Russia. For the first time since the beginning of the 1990s, millions of people were engaged in live political action, which took place in the streets. In this political activity we can already observe a battle of ideas and alternatives being played out between three forces: democrats, militants of the radical left and nationalists. This battle of ideas has as its backdrop a task that everyone has made theirs: the bringing down of the Putin system and the re-establishment of elementary political liberties.
The perspectives for this newly born movement are doubtful. But, at all events, nothing is as it was before. We are entering a new period of history where the anti-capitalist left will have a greater role to play than in the past.
[Ilya Boudraïtksis is a leader of the Vpered (Forward) organisation, which has established relations with the Fourth International.]