Donate to Links
Click on Links masthead to clear previous query from search box
- Global State in Panich-Gindin? Where?
1 day 12 min ago
- Celebrity revolutionaries v serious commentary
1 day 6 hours ago
- Russian imperialism
1 day 15 hours ago
- TeleSUR: Ukraine fighting intensifies (19/8/2014)
2 days 6 hours ago
- RUTH FIRST´s PLACE IN THE SOUTH AFRICAN REVOLUTION - Part II
3 days 3 hours ago
- Latin American left governments and Sri Lanka
3 days 19 hours ago
- Letter from eastern Ukraine: ‘The collapse of the liberal ‘left’
4 days 7 hours ago
- Who Is Bernie Sanders?
4 days 22 hours ago
- Left Must Resist Ban on UCP
5 days 5 hours ago
- ALBA - Sri Lanka.-- Bolivian Vice President Álvaro García Linera
6 days 16 min ago
"Waterside worker', by Noel Counihan, 1963.
By Chris Slee
March 18, 2013 – Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal -- In his article entitled “Is there a labour aristocracy in Australia?” (published in the Socialist Alternative magazine, Marxist Left Review) Tom Bramble criticises the concept of the “labour aristocracy” on a number of grounds.
By Nick Fredman
January 2013 -- Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal; this is a preprint of an article submitted for consideration in Capitalism, Nature, Socialism, copyright 2013 Taylor and Francis; Capitalism, Nature, Socialism is available at http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/rcns20/current.
This article* examines the extent to which Green parties can be considered social-democratic formations. The Australian Greens, since 2010 in de facto governmental coalition with the Labor Party, are posited as an important case study of the global Green party movement. The Australian Greens have generally been seen as a far-left party, as expressing the views of the new social movements or as a site of tension between these two tendencies.
Introduction by Doug Lorimer
I. Lenin's aims in writing this work
The term "imperialism" came into common usage in England in the 1890s as a development of the older term "empire" by the advocates of a major effort to extend the British Empire in opposition to the policy of concentrating on national economic development, the supporters of which the advocates of imperialism dismissed as "Little Englanders". The term was rapidly taken into other languages to describe the contest between rival European states to secure colonies and spheres of influence in Africa and Asia, a contest that dominated international politics from the mid-1880s to 1914, and caused this period to be named the "age of imperialism".
The first systematic critique of imperialism was made by the English bourgeois social-reformist economist John Atkinson Hobson (1858-1940) in his 1902 book Imperialism: A Study, which, as Lenin observes at the beginning of his own book on the subject, "gives a very good and comprehensive description of the principal specific economic and political features of imperialism" (see below, p. 33).
Lenin had long been familiar with Hobson's book. Indeed, in a letter written from Geneva to his mother in St. Petersburg on August 29, 1904, Lenin stated that he had just "received Hobson's book on imperialism and have begun translating it" into Russian.(1)