By Carlos Quiroz, peruanista.blogspot.com
June 19, 2008 (updated June 26) -- The
videos you are about to see are a bit shocking. For 18 months the
people of the Moquegua region (southeastern Peru) and the mining
workers from that region have been seeking for peaceful negotiations
with the Peruvian government in Lima.
The Moqueguanos were
trying to lobby against a bill sent by the Peruvian executive to
Congress, which could mean a reduction in the royalties paid by foreign
mining companies -- Southern Copper Corporation (USA/Mexico) in this
case -- which are very important for the Moquegua region. But workers were ignored.
it was clear for the more than 22,000 people of Moquegua -- they are not
delinquents as the press in Lima has called them -- that their protest was necessary and legitimate. They began a hunger strike and
blockade of a national highway, on June 11.
The violence we
can see in these videos is the result of the negligence and arrogance
of President Alan Garcia's administration and Peru's right-wing politicians.
They have attacked workers who are fighting for their legitimate
interests with tear gas.
Unarmed people attacked
images are evidence of crimes committed by the Peruvian government.
More than 30 people were wounded, including children and women.
Our right to protest
Peruvian government has the obligation to listen to its citizens, but
instead it has responded with excessive violence. Unfortunately this proves that only these kind
of protests are the most appropriate way for all Peruvians to reclaim
their rights because the central government in Lima will not listen
otherwise. Peruvians must use fully their right to peaceful protest,
free expression and full participation in their communities.
of trying to find solutions, Jorge del Castillo, who is the president of
the council of ministers, Luis Alva the minister of interior (police
and internal security) and the Southern Copper Corporation directors, denounced the
protesters and accused them of crimes, threatening to imprison their protest leaders.
The government bureaucrats talk
comfortably in Lima, while they send 500 police -- who are as poor as
the miners -- with orders to violently repress their own people.
President Garcia should be in Moquegua talking with his citizens, but
obviously he is not interested in doing so.
Peruvian miners that work for Southern Copper Corporation, started a 48-hour strike on June 19 calling for better wages and
against the reduction of mining royalties. They also announced
another strike for June 23. The Federation of Miners of Peru (FMP), which represents about 28,000 miners and 70 unions, has announced a nationwide strike for June 30
to demand that Congress pass a separate law to improve pensions,
labour rights for subcontractors and a greater participation in the
Who is the Peruvian government protecting?
Copper Corporation -- formerly known as Southern Peru Copper
Corporation -- is a multinational mining company founded in 1952 and
based in Phoenix, Arizona. It's a subsidiary of America Mining
Corporation, with operations in Peru, Mexico and Chile. It produces and
sells copper, molybdenum, zinc, silver, lead and gold. The company
operates mines in Peru --Toquepala and Cuajone in the Peruvian Andes,
southeast of Lima -- and also a smelter and refinery in the coastal city of
Ilo. One of SCC's mines in Mexico was shut down by a strike since
July last year. Its ownership is currently shared by investors from the
US and Mexico mostly.
June 26, 2008 -- President Alan Garcia ordered an attack that included bombings and shootings, but it failed to defeat the civilians. During
the attacks, 700 police officers under the commande of General Alberto
Jordán, head of the Arequipa division of the Peruvian National Police
(PNP), went after 20,000 people who had blocked streets and roads of
this mining town located in a beautiful and peaceful valley.
Jordan had received clear orders from Lima: to sho-t people executiont-style. Instead, he put his gun down and ordered his troops to do the
same. He was taken hostage quietly, among 63 other officers, by the Moqueguanos, but they were all freed when the Garcia administration agreed to negotiate.
A popular victory
the courageous response of the Moqueguan people, and under a huge
pressure from non-government organisations and human rights
advocates, the Peruvian goverment had to accept a dialogue with the
protesters. But President Alan Garcia, his prime minister, Jorge del
Castillo, and his minister of the interior, Luis Alva , (in charge of the PNP)
did not bother to travel to Moquegua. They requested that Moqueguan leaders travel to Lima.
Finally, after a 14-hour long
session, both parties signed an eight-point agreement that met the goals set
by the people of Moquegua. This was a condition in order to
stop their protests.
The media in Peru were divided in their reactions to the agreement,
with very few outlets informing Peruvians of the true reasons for the
protests. But most TV stations and newspapers accused the
rioters of being delinquents, thugs or terrorists. Manipulated
pro-Garcia journalists and analysts asked for strong military and penal
action to prevent more popular replicas of what they called the ``Moqueguazo'' revolts. They ignored the fact that aside from the mining workers there were children and women, who came from 17 small communities to
defend their rights for better living conditions.
General Alberto Jordan has been ousted by President Garcia and
blamed for the violent events, said that he didn't handle the revolts
with strong hand. Jordan is now being investigated by the
authorities. So far, not a single
member of the Garcia administration has resigned or accepted any
responsibility for the violent attacks against the human rights of
Peruvian citizens. In fact, politicians, the right-wing media and ``well-to-do'' jurists are asking the government to take judiciary
action against the community leaders who led the protests. The
chairperson of the Attorneys' Bar of Lima (CAL) Walter Gutierrez has said
that the civilians committed crimes ``against private property,
kidnapping, extortion and resistance against the authorities''.
What is next?
people of Moquegua are pleased to know that finally their region will
get a fair share of funds from the extraction of their natural resources by
foreign corporations backed by the government of Lima. But they are not
resting in their laurels. Things are far from settling down.
action against community leaders is being planned already by the
Fiscalia -- Peru's justice department -- as a way to punish their ``insolence'' and rebellion against national authorities. Gladys Echaiz,
Peru's national prosecutor, has said that "we will do our job
backed by our constitution and laws''. Echaiz said that there is ``an
organisation'' behind the riots and that civilians are already under
investigation, based on oral testimony and videos recorded by the
government to identity who was involved in these actions.
The people in Moquegua have declared that they will protest again
if any of their leaders are detained or arrested, and they are serious
about it, especially after the strong international support they have gained.
The neighbouring region of Tacna (on the border
with Chile) has said it doesn't accept the agreement between Lima and
Moquegua, since it has long benefited by the previous system of
Meanwhile, a national strike in all Peru is planned for July 9 by labour unions, student and women's rights organisations, farmers' unions
and leftist political parties. This strike is to protest neoliberal
economic policies, the high cost of living, authoritarian and violent
repression, poverty, injustice, the criminalisation of social protest,
protection of the environment and natural resources, protection for
farmers, for retired workers rights, against privatisation and for
This is an article posted by Inter Press Service:
PERU: Rights groups warn of authoritarian tendencies
By Ángel Páez
Jun 25 (IPS) - The government of Peruvian President Alan García has
demonstrated an authoritarian bent in its intolerance of social protest
or any form of criticism, and has sponsored draft laws that treat
demonstrations as criminal activity, say human rights groups and
García, of the American Popular Revolutionary
Alliance (APRA), has consistently favoured mining and oil companies
despite growing protests from local communities and environmentalists,
says a new report by the National Human Rights Coordinator (CNDH),
which groups 67 local non-governmental organisations (NGOs).
government’s response to the popular discontent over its economic
policies has been to clamp down on protests and reject dialogue, a
strategy that has merely generated greater social conflict, says the
Local authorities and residents in the southern town of
Moquegua recently brought activity to a halt for 10 days with
roadblocks in that normally peaceful part of the country because the
government did not address their demand for equal distribution of the
usage fees paid by mining companies.
In Moquegua, where 25
percent of the population lives below the poverty line, one of the
lowest levels in Peru, the government initially ordered the police to
crack down on the strikers, who numbered around 20,000, but was forced
in the end to negotiate an agreement.
The Defensoría del Pueblo
(ombudsman’s office) reported that only 33 percent of the social
conflicts that broke out in the country in 2007 were resolved through
dialogue, and that 85 percent of the protests took place in areas where
a majority of the population lives in poverty. (Ten of Peru’s 24
regions, mainly in the country’s Andean highlands, have poverty rates
ranging from 54 to 85 percent).
The Defensoría said that 48
percent of the conflicts that occurred last year were over
environmental issues and 27 percent were protests against local
García "has responded with laws that criminalise social protest," said CNDH executive secretary Ronald Gamarra.
government has also "issued worrisome decrees that make the security
forces the only mechanism to curb protest movements, while encouraging
the passage of laws that treat popular demands and grievances as
manifestations of organised crime. This is the reign of intolerance,"
said the activist.
The CNDH report refers to incidents that
occurred in 2007, but activists say the authoritarian tendency has
gotten worse this year.
"We know it is necessary to tackle
delinquency and organised crime, but social protest is a completely
different thing," said Gamarra. "It would seem that the neoliberal
economic model can’t guarantee its own survival without repression."
Feb. 19, during a farm strike organised by the Junta de Usuarios del
Distrito de Riego de Ayacucho (JUDRA - Ayacucho's Union of Irrigation
Users), the police used firearms to break up a demonstration, and two
peasant farmers were killed.
Interior Minister Luis Alva Castro
told Congress that the killers were "infiltrators" and that the police
did not use their weapons.
However, the Ayacucho district
attorney accused a police officer, Carlos Rodríguez, of killing the two
farmers, Emiliano García and Rubén Pariona, and the officer admitted
that he fired his gun.
Nevertheless, the García administration has stood by its version of events: that the two men were killed by "infiltrators."
APRA Congresswoman Mercedes Cabanillas blamed the protest in Ayacucho, one of Peru’s poorest regions, on the "outdated left."
influential APRA lawmaker, Aurelio Pastor Valdivieso, told IPS that the
government has respected people’s rights, and denied that there is any
tendency towards authoritarianism.
"In Peru, absolutely all
freedoms are not only respected but guaranteed. There is also a
commitment on the part of the government and the governing party to
respect and totally defend the exercise of basic rights," he said.
problem is that there are people who mistake the government’s respect
and tolerance for a kind of weakness and try to take advantage of that
to incite protests, violence and even killings, like what happened in
the recent farm strike in Ayacucho," he argued.
Valdivieso said the state "has the absolute right to take steps to
defend its citizens, for which it has police forces, laws and
regulations. It is determined not to allow disorder, chaos and the
sensation of misgovernment to prevail in Peru."
Jorge del Castillo has also said the protests and demonstrations are
the work of "pro-terrorists" and "NGOs financed from abroad that are
opposed to the country’s development."
The government insists on
encouraging the passage of tougher laws. "The new legislation, contrary
to what is stipulated in the constitution, makes it possible for many
of the abuses that the police may commit in clamping down on social
protests to go unpunished," says the CNDH report.
At the same
time, the government has promoted laws "that favour the extractive
industries, like the issuing of (private) land titles in (indigenous)
peasant communities and the government’s determined support of mining
and oil companies in areas where the activity could hurt the health of
the local population," the report adds.
The CNDH says the new
laws demonstrate the "intransigence" of the government’s policies, even
when the social costs are high and the economic benefits are
questionable. It also says the government has benefited the economic
power groups "at the expense of local populations."
Reyna, a sociologist at the Pontificia Catholic University who
identifies with APRA, agreed that there have been a number of signs of
a tendency towards authoritarianism on the part of the government.
a string of measures and decrees restricting the political freedom and
free speech of citizens, President García has an extremely aggressive,
confrontational and polarising style when it comes to dealing with
social protests and anti-government demonstrations," Reyna told IPS.
that you have to add cases where the police have opened fire against
demonstrators, causing deaths, and only subordinates were punished
while no officials have been accused or identified by the executive
branch or the ruling party majority in the legislature, which on the
contrary has constantly ‘shielded’ the interior minister.
legislature has even given the police permission to open fire on social
protests. So, yes, there are definitely authoritarian tendencies," said
The chief of police in Moquegua, General Alberto Jordán,
refused to lift a roadblock and was sacked after García called him a
"coward" for not following his orders. Jordán said that if he had
carried out the order, many people would have died.
In a Jun. 18
report, the Defensoría del Pueblo mentioned 65 current and potential
social conflicts, 10 of which it said were about to break out, and
seven of which involved local villages opposed to the activities of
"There is a tense social climate. By
generating the sensation that the state is not willing to compromise,
the possibility of negotiated solutions is thrown into question," warns
the CNDH. (END/2008)
In mid-June 2008, President Alan Garcia had a 30% of national approval, while in the southern regions of Peru a whopping 90% expressed opposition to his policies.
case you still wondering what is going on in Peru and why Peruvians are
facing such violent attacks from their own government, these are some
Peru is a post-colonial country,
controlled by a small group of corrupt, racist people based mostly in
Lima, who are descendants of families who ruled this land since it was
a Spanish colony. They are backed by corrupt politicians and
business owners who have made extraordinary fortunes by controlling the
lives of 28 million people and their natural resources.
Lima and one or two other coastal cities grow, most of the rest of
the regions in the Andean nation are kept impoverished and terribly
underdeveloped. These regions are precisely where mostly Indigenous and
African-descendant people live. In provinces like Moquegua, valuable
natural resources are located.
These resources are extracted by
foreign corporations and exported to rich developed countries,
especially the US, China and Europe, which need the minerals for their
manufacturing and armaments industries. In this inhumane and polluting
business, only the foreign investors and their rich Peruvian partners benefit, while miners live under horrible conditions and entire
Andean towns, rivers and lakes are destroyed.
The current Garcia
administration is ruling in favour of the rich and powerful, increasing
injustice and poverty among those who have been historically neglected.
So when you read about how well the economy of Peru is doing, it means
that the rich are doing good business and the huge majority still live
in poverty. This is just the continuation of the same policies that
make Peru such an unfair nation for centuries, and something needs to
be done to correct that.
Obviously, Peruvians are aware of that.