Hugo Chávez writes on `The battle of Copenhagen'
By Hugo Chávez Frías, President of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, translated by Kiraz Janicke for Links International Journal of Socialist Renewal
December 20, 2009
“I will not tire of repeating to the four winds: the only possible and viable alternative is socialism. I said it in each of my speeches to all the world representatives gathered in Copenhagen, the world's most important event in the last two hundred years: there is no other way if we want to stop this heartless and debased competition that promises only total annihilation." – Hugo Chávez
I
Copenhagen was the
scene of a historic battle in the framework of the 15th Conference of the
United Nations Convention on Climate Change (COP15). Better said, in the
beautiful, snowy capital of Denmark, a battle began that did not end on Friday,
December 18, 2009. I reiterate: Copenhagen was only the beginning of a decisive
battle for the salvation of the planet. It
was a battle in the realm of ideas and in praxis.
Brazilian Leonardo Boff, a great
liberation theologian and one of the most authoritative voices on environmental
issues, in a key article, entitled What
is at stake in Copenhagen?, wrote these words full of insight and courage: What
can we expect from Copenhagen? At least this simple confession: We
cannot continue like this. And a simple proposition: Let’s change course.
And for that reason, precisely, we went to Copenhagen to battle for a change of course on behalf of Venezuela, on behalf of the Bolivarian Alliance (ALBA), and moreover, in defence of the cause of humanity and to speak, with President Evo Morales, in defence of the rights of Pachamama, of Mother Earth.
Evo, who
together with yours truly, had the responsibility to be a spokesperson for the Bolivarian
Alliance, wisely said: What this debate is about, is whether we are going to
live or we are going to die.
All eyes of the world were
concentrated on Copenhagen: the 15th Conference on Climate Change allowed us to
gauge the fibre we are made of, where hope lies and what can we do to establish
what the Liberator Simón Bolívar defined as the equilibrium of the universe, an
equilibrium that can never be achieved within the capitalist world system.
Before our arrival
in Copenhagen, the African bloc, backed by the Group of 77, denounced that rich countries were ignoring
the Kyoto Protocol, that is, the only existing international instrument to
fight global warming, the only thing that penalises the industrialised states and
protects the developing countries.
It is necessary to recognise
that the battle had already begun in the streets of Copenhagen, with the youth
at the forefront protesting and proposing: I could see and feel, since my
arrival in the Danish capital on December 16, the historic power of another world
that for the youth is not only possible but absolutely necessary.
In Copenhagen, from the
beginning, the cards were on the table for all to see. On the one hand, the
cards of brutal meanness and stupidity of capitalism which did not budge in
defence of its logic: the logic of capital, which leaves only death and
destruction in its wake at an increasingly rapid pace.
On the other hand, the
cards of the peoples demanding human dignity, the salvation of the planet and
for a radical change, not of the climate, but of a world system that has
brought us to the brink of unprecedented ecological and social catastrophe.
On one side, the victors of a mercantile and utilitarian civilisation, that is, the “civilised ones” who for a long time now have forgotten about human beings, and opted blindly for increasingly insatiable desires.
On the other hand, the “barbarians” who remain committed in believing and in fighting for radically changing the logic, that you can maximise human welfare, minimising environmental and ecological impacts. Those who sustain the impossibility of defending human rights, as raised by the comrade Evo Morales, if we don’t also defend the rights of Mother Earth, those who act with determination to leave a planet and future for our descendants.
I will not tire of
repeating to the four winds: the only possible and viable alternative is
socialism. I said it in each of my speeches to all the world representatives
gathered in Copenhagen, the world's most important event in the last two
hundred years: there is no other way if we want to stop this heartless and
debased competition that promises only total annihilation.
Why are the “civilised
ones” so afraid of a project that aspires to build shared happiness? They are
afraid, let’s be honest, because shared happiness does not generate profit.
Hence the crystal clarity of that great slogan of the Copenhagen street protest
that today speaks for millions: “If the climate was a bank, they would have
saved it already.”
The “civilised ones” do not
take the necessary measures, simply because of this, it would oblige them to
reverse their voracious pattern of life, marked by selfish comfort and that
does not touch their cold hearts, which palpitate only to the beat of money.
That’s why the [US] Empire arrived late on December 18, to offer crumbs via blackmail, and through this, wash away the guilt marked on its face. In front of this strategy of buying support, you could hear throughout Denmark the clear and courageous voice of Vandana Shiva, the Indian thinker saying a great truth: “I think it is time for US to stop seeing itself as a donor and begin to recognise itself as polluter: a polluter must pay compensation for damages and must it pay its ecological debt. It is not charity. This is justice.”
I must say: in Copenhagen the Obama illusion was definitively destroyed. He was confirmed in his position as head of the empire and winner of the Nobel War Prize. The enigma of the two Obamas has been resolved.
Friday the 18th
came to an end without a democratically agreed accord: Obama mounted the
platform separately, in a further violation of UN procedures, for which we feel
obliged to challenge any decision that does not respect for the validity of the
Protocol Kyoto. To respect and enhance Kyoto is our motto.
An accord was not possible in
Copenhagen due to the lack of political will of the rich countries: the
powerful of this world, the hyper-developed, they do not want to change their patterns
of production and consumption which are as senseless as suicide. “The world can
go to hell if it dares to threaten my privilege and my lifestyle”, is what they
appear to be saying with their conduct: that is the hard truth that they do not
want to hear from those who act under the historical and categorical imperative
to change course.
Copenhagen is not the
end, I repeat, but a beginning: the doors have been opened for a universal
debate on how to save the planet, life on the planet. The battle
continues.
We commemorated the 179th anniversary of the physical disappearance of our Liberator Simón Bolívar in an act of deep revolutionary content; I refer to the meeting of the Bolivarian Alliance with social movements in Denmark on December 17. There I felt, once again that Bolivar is not only a banner of Venezuela and Our America, but is increasingly a universal leader.
It is his living and combative legacy, now embodied in the Bolivarian Alliance, which is becoming a world heritage, that we took to Copenhagen to do battle for the Patria Grande, which is at the same time, to do battle for the sake of humanity .
In reality
and in truth: Bolivar lives! In Copenhagen it was confirmed that his legacy is
more alive than ever.
And now he will overcome.
Now we shall overcome!
Kiribati leader calls Copenhagen a charade
Tong says process serves no purpose
WELLINGTON, New Zealand (Radio New Zealand International, Dec. 21, 2009) – The President of Kiribati says the failure of the Copenhagen climate change conference to come up with a strong legally binding agreement raises questions about the negotiation process. Anote Tong says the accord proposed by the United States and other major emitters seems to accommodate countries which were concerned about the emissions cuts that would be required. The President says the lack of targets on cutting emissions suggests some countries came to the conference not wanting to reach an agreement. “That’s very disappointing, I think it raises a lot of questions, credibility, about the international system. Does it serve any purpose at all, what purpose is it for us to participate in an arrangement where we continue to be thinking in nationalistic terms regardless of the price that other countries have to pay?” Anote Tong says Kiribati is working on plans to cope with climate change which includes relocation as a last resort.
Bolivia calls World Conference of Social Movements
April 22, 2010: International Day of Mother Earth
CHUQUISACA, Bolivia, December 20 — Bolivian President Evo Morales announced today that a world conference of social movements is to take place in Bolivia, as a response to the failure of the 15th Summit on Climate Change, recently held in Copenhagen.
“The problems of climate change are directly linked to the irrational development of industry,” said the president at the celebrations for the 49th anniversary of the foundation of the Culpina municipality, in the region of Chuquisaca.
Morales said that he has requested technical and scientific arguments to support a large-scale international mobilization to defend the environment, especially water.
The meeting will take place on April 22, which is the International Day of Mother Earth.
“It will be a great meeting where we’ll be able to come up with solutions for the problem of climate change,” the leader said.
He regretted that the summit held in Copenhagen had concluded without reaching any important agreement. However, he noted that the event was an opportunity to break the hegemony of industrialized countries attending the gathering.
“If we don’t make important decisions now, our children and the generations to come will be faced with serious problems,” warned the president.
He pointed out that the Bolivian world conference of social movements will be aimed at finding options for guaranteeing food for the peoples, in view of the famine that is affecting different parts of the world.
(Granma, December 21, 2009)