South Korea
South Korea's candlelight revolution
By International Strategy Center
South Korea’s historic candle light protests bring down President Park
South Korea's civic revolution: Another mega-protest puts impeachment process back on track
South Korea: Organising to bring down the government and change society
South Korea: As millions take to the street, government teeters on the edge of collapse
South Korea: Rail workers strike against privatisation, general strike called
Railway workers' three-week strike against privatisation garnered wide support—and g
Behind the crisis: US tightens chokehold on North Korea
US and South Korean soldiers take part in joint military exercises in Pohang, South Korea.
By David Whitehouse
April 22, 2013 -- Socialist Worker (USA) -- In the 60 years since the end of the Korean War, US policy toward North Korea has fluctuated between the options of "containment" and "rollback".
Sometimes, the policy has shifted in the course of one presidency. Bill Clinton and George W. Bush both started out as advocates of rollback -- regime change, either by military force or by provoking an internal collapse -- but ended as caretakers of containment.
Barack Obama -- who campaigned for the White House in 2008 on a promise to conduct direct talks with North Korea, in contrast to the belligerent rhetoric of the Bush years -- seems to have followed an opposite trajectory since his first months in office. Though you wouldn't know it to judge from the US media, this aggressive posture in Washington is a driving factor in the escalating tensions that have landed the Korean conflict on the front pages in recent weeks.